Literature DB >> 18825377

Attitudes among hospital physicians to the reporting of adverse drug reactions in Sweden.

Elisabet Ekman1, M Bäckström.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to investigate attitudes to and incentive for reporting adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in general and towards nurses as reporters of ADRs in particular in a sample of hospital physicians.
METHOD: A questionnaire was sent to 1,201 randomly selected hospital physicians.
RESULTS: The main factors for the decision to report an ADR were the severity of the reaction, a reaction to a new drug, and an unusual reaction. The most important factor for refraining from reporting was that the reaction was well known. There were no significant differences between males and females or between age groups in these aspects. A majority were positive or neutral to nurses as reporters. Only 6% stated that their willingness to report ADRs would be affected in a negative way if nurses were involved in the program for reporting.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey showed that inclusion of hospital nurses as reporters will not decrease the reporting rate from the physicians.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18825377     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-008-0564-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  10 in total

1.  Attitudinal survey of voluntary reporting of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  I A Eland; K J Belton; A C van Grootheest; A P Meiners; M D Rawlins; B H Stricker
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Attitudes to reporting adverse drug reactions in northern Sweden.

Authors:  M Bäckström; T Mjörndal; R Dahlqvist; T Nordkvist-Olsson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Physicians' knowledge and attitudes regarding the spontaneous reporting system for adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  J Hasford; M Goettler; K-H Munter; B Müller-Oerlinghausen
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Reasons for reporting adverse drug reactions--some thoughts based on an international review.

Authors:  C Biriell; I R Edwards
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  The nature of the scientific evidence leading to drug withdrawals for pharmacovigilance reasons in France.

Authors:  Pascale Olivier; Jean-Louis Montastruc
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.890

6.  Adverse drug reaction reporting by nurses in Sweden.

Authors:  M Bäckström; Elisabet Ekman; T Mjörndal
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Reporting of adverse drug reactions may be influenced by feedback to the reporting doctor.

Authors:  Susanna M Wallerstedt; Gertrud Brunlöf; Marie-Louise Johansson; Carina Tukukino; Lars Ny
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  [Thrombosis caused by oracl contraceptives. Underreporting to the adverse effects registry].

Authors:  E Samuelsson; S Hägg; M Bäckström; K Granberg; T Mjörndal
Journal:  Lakartidningen       Date:  1996-09-11

9.  Attitudes to adverse drug reaction reporting by medical practitioners in a Northern Italian district.

Authors:  M Cosentino; O Leoni; F Banfi; S Lecchini; G Frigo
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 7.658

10.  Under-reporting of serious adverse drug reactions in Sweden.

Authors:  M Bäckström; T Mjörndal; R Dahlqvist
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.890

  10 in total
  26 in total

1.  Expectations for feedback in adverse drug reporting by healthcare professionals in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Ingrid Oosterhuis; Florence P A M van Hunsel; Eugène P van Puijenbroek
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  The importance of direct patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions: a patient perspective.

Authors:  Claire Anderson; Janet Krska; Elizabeth Murphy; Anthony Avery
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Reporting of adverse drug reactions by general practitioners: a questionnaire-based study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Anneke Passier; Marije ten Napel; Kees van Grootheest; Eugène van Puijenbroek
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Are consumers ready to take part in the Pharmacovigilance System?--a Portuguese preliminary study concerning ADR reporting.

Authors:  Cristiano Matos; Florence van Hunsel; João Joaquim
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  An educational intervention's effect on healthcare professionals' attitudes towards pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Nisha Jha; Devendra Singh Rathore; P Ravi Shankar; Sudesh Gyawali; Mohamed Alshakka; Shital Bhandary
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2014-12-31

6.  The impact of a changed legislation on reporting of adverse drug reactions in Sweden, with focus on nurses' reporting.

Authors:  Sofia A Karlsson; Ingela Jacobsson; Marit Danell Boman; Katja M Hakkarainen; Henrik Lövborg; Staffan Hägg; Anna K Jönsson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Factors that affect adverse drug reaction reporting among hospital pharmacists in Western China.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Zhongliang Zhou; Shimin Yang; Bianling Feng; Jun Zhao; Hua Liu; Haiyan Huang; Yu Fang
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2015-04-02

8.  Improving adverse drug reaction reporting in hospitals: results of the French Pharmacovigilance in Midi-Pyrénées region (PharmacoMIP) network 2-year pilot study.

Authors:  Mireille Gony; Kattalin Badie; Agnès Sommet; Julien Jacquot; Dominique Baudrin; Pierre Gauthier; Jean Louis Montastruc; Haleh Bagheri
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Awareness among nurses about reporting of adverse drug reactions in Sweden.

Authors:  Elisabet Ekman; Göran Petersson; Sven Tågerud; Martin Bäckström
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2012-06-28

10.  Attitudes among healthcare professionals to the reporting of adverse drug reactions in Nepal.

Authors:  K C Santosh; Pramote Tragulpiankit; Sarun Gorsanan; I Ralph Edwards
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 2.483

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.