Literature DB >> 18823994

Probing possible downhill folding: native contact topology likely places a significant constraint on the folding cooperativity of proteins with approximately 40 residues.

Artem Badasyan1, Zhirong Liu, Hue Sun Chan.   

Abstract

Experiments point to appreciable variations in folding cooperativity among natural proteins with approximately 40 residues, indicating that the behaviors of these proteins are valuable for delineating the contributing factors to cooperative folding. To explore the role of native topology in a protein's propensity to fold cooperatively and how native topology might constrain the degree of cooperativity achievable by a given set of physical interactions, we compared folding/unfolding kinetics simulated using three classes of native-centric C(alpha) chain models with different interaction schemes. The approach was applied to two homologous 45-residue fragments from the peripheral subunit-binding domain family and a 39-residue fragment of the N-terminal domain of ribosomal protein L9. Free-energy profiles as functions of native contact number were computed to assess the heights of thermodynamic barriers to folding. In addition, chevron plots of folding/unfolding rates were constructed as functions of native stability to facilitate comparison with available experimental data. Although common Gō-like models with pairwise Lennard-Jones-type interactions generally fold less cooperatively than real proteins, the rank ordering of cooperativity predicted by these models is consistent with experiment for the proteins investigated, showing increasing folding cooperativity with increasing nonlocality of a protein's native contacts. Models that account for water-expulsion (desolvation) barriers and models with many-body (nonadditive) interactions generally entail higher degrees of folding cooperativity indicated by more linear model chevron plots, but the rank ordering of cooperativity remains unchanged. A robust, experimentally valid rank ordering of model folding cooperativity independent of the multiple native-centric interaction schemes tested here argues that native topology places significant constraints on how cooperatively a protein can fold.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18823994     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.09.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  12 in total

1.  Folding simulations of a de novo designed protein with a betaalphabeta fold.

Authors:  Yifei Qi; Yongqi Huang; Huanhuan Liang; Zhirong Liu; Luhua Lai
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Native topology of the designed protein Top7 is not conducive to cooperative folding.

Authors:  Zhuqing Zhang; Hue Sun Chan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Dynamics of one-state downhill protein folding.

Authors:  Peng Li; Fabiana Y Oliva; Athi N Naganathan; Victor Muñoz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Competition between native topology and nonnative interactions in simple and complex folding kinetics of natural and designed proteins.

Authors:  Zhuqing Zhang; Hue Sun Chan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Observation of two families of folding pathways of BBL.

Authors:  Jue Fan; Mojie Duan; Da-Wei Li; Hao Wu; Haijun Yang; Li Han; Shuanghong Huo
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Perplexing cooperative folding and stability of a low-sequence complexity, polyproline 2 protein lacking a hydrophobic core.

Authors:  Zachary P Gates; Michael C Baxa; Wookyung Yu; Joshua A Riback; Hui Li; Benoît Roux; Stephen B H Kent; Tobin R Sosnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Transition paths, diffusive processes, and preequilibria of protein folding.

Authors:  Zhuqing Zhang; Hue Sun Chan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Biophysics of protein evolution and evolutionary protein biophysics.

Authors:  Tobias Sikosek; Hue Sun Chan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Disordered linkers in multidomain allosteric proteins: Entropic effect to favor the open state or enhanced local concentration to favor the closed state?

Authors:  Maodong Li; Huaiqing Cao; Luhua Lai; Zhirong Liu
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Nonnative interactions in coupled folding and binding processes of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Yongqi Huang; Zhirong Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.