Literature DB >> 18823674

International perspectives on the cost-effectiveness of tandem mass spectrometry for rare metabolic conditions.

Richard Norman1, Marion Haas, Bridget Wilcken.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine and evaluate the economic evidence regarding the use of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) for the detection of rare metabolic conditions in neonates, and then to consider the transferability of these national-level results to other decision-making contexts.
METHODS: A systematic literature review was undertaken, identifying papers published between January 1997 and March 2008. Thirteen unique cost-effectiveness evaluations were identified and appraised for comparability and transferability of results across settings.
RESULTS: The primary outcome measure was usually life years gained (LYG) or quality-adjusted life years gained (QALY). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) presented were generally supportive of MS/MS, but showed considerable variation. Differences in assumptions made regarding prevalence and prognosis played a significant role in this variation.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in study structure, the approach to costing, the choice of intervention, control and outcome measure, and the limit of studies to developed countries makes international generalisation of the cost-effectiveness evidence difficult. The importance of assumptions regarding disease progression and subsequent health care utilisation suggests that further work needs to consider the importance of longer-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18823674     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  7 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness/Cost-Benefit Analysis of Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immune Deficiency in Washington State.

Authors:  Yao Ding; John D Thompson; Lisa Kobrynski; Jelili Ojodu; Guisou Zarbalian; Scott D Grosse
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of universal newborn screening for medium chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency in France.

Authors:  Françoise F Hamers; Catherine Rumeau-Pichon
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 3.  Funding decisions for newborn screening: a comparative review of 22 decision processes in Europe.

Authors:  Katharina Elisabeth Fischer; Wolf Henning Rogowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Neonatal Screening: Cost-utility Analysis for Galactosemia.

Authors:  Nahid Hatam; Mehrdad Askarian; Samad Shirvani; Elham Siavashi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.429

5.  Health services use among children diagnosed with medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency through newborn screening: a cohort study in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Maria D Karaceper; Sara D Khangura; Kumanan Wilson; Doug Coyle; Marni Brownell; Christine Davies; Linda Dodds; Annette Feigenbaum; Deshayne B Fell; Scott D Grosse; Astrid Guttmann; Steven Hawken; Robin Z Hayeems; Jonathan B Kronick; Anne-Marie Laberge; Julian Little; Aizeddin Mhanni; John J Mitchell; Meranda Nakhla; Murray Potter; Chitra Prasad; Cheryl Rockman-Greenberg; Rebecca Sparkes; Sylvia Stockler; Keiko Ueda; Hilary Vallance; Brenda J Wilson; Pranesh Chakraborty; Beth K Potter
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 4.123

6.  Specific guidelines for assessing and improving the methodological quality of economic evaluations of newborn screening.

Authors:  Astrid Langer; Rolf Holle; Jürgen John
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  An Economic Evaluation of Neonatal Screening for Inborn Errors of Metabolism Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Thailand.

Authors:  Kittiphong Thiboonboon; Pattara Leelahavarong; Duangrurdee Wattanasirichaigoon; Nithiwat Vatanavicharn; Pornswan Wasant; Vorasuk Shotelersuk; Suthipong Pangkanon; Chulaluck Kuptanon; Sumonta Chaisomchit; Yot Teerawattananon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.