Literature DB >> 18823427

Schizophrenia diagnosis and anterior hippocampal volume make separate contributions to sensory gating.

Robert J Thoma1, Faith M Hanlon, Helen Petropoulos, Gregory A Miller, Sandra N Moses, Ashley Smith, Lauren Parks, S Laura Lundy, Natalie M Sanchez, Aaron Jones, Mingxiong Huang, Michael P Weisend, Jose M Cañive.   

Abstract

Impaired P50 gating is thought to reflect a core deficit in schizophrenia, but the relevant neural network is not well understood. The present study used EEG and MEG to assess sensory gating and volumetric MRI to measure hippocampal volume to investigate relationships between them in 22 normal controls and 22 patients with schizophrenia. In the schizophrenia group, anterior but not posterior hippocampal volume was smaller, and both the P50 and M50 gating ratios were larger (worse) than in controls. Independent of group, left-hemisphere M50 gating ratio correlated negatively with left anterior hippocampal volume, and right-hemisphere M50 gating ratio correlated negatively with right anterior hippocampal volume. Schizophrenia diagnosis predicted M50 gating independent of hippocampal volume. These results are consistent with the finding that hippocampus is a critical part of a fronto-temporal circuit involved in auditory gating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18823427      PMCID: PMC2789296          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00692.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  67 in total

Review 1.  Misunderstanding analysis of covariance.

Authors:  G A Miller; J P Chapman
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2001-02

2.  Comparison of four components of sensory gating in schizophrenia and normal subjects: a preliminary report.

Authors:  N N Boutros; A Belger; D Campbell; C D'Souza; J Krystal
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  1999-11-08       Impact factor: 3.222

3.  GABAB antagonists diminish the inhibitory gating of auditory response in the rat hippocampus.

Authors:  K M Hershman; R Freedman; P C Bickford
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1995-05-05       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Non-invasive detection of neuronal population activity in human hippocampus.

Authors:  C D Tesche; J Karhu; S O Tissari
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1996-07

Review 5.  Configural association theory and the hippocampal formation: an appraisal and reconfiguration.

Authors:  J W Rudy; R J Sutherland
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  The activity of hippocampal interneurons and pyramidal cells during the response of the hippocampus to repeated auditory stimuli.

Authors:  C L Miller; R Freedman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Increased sensitivity to the sensorimotor gating-disruptive effects of apomorphine after lesions of medial prefrontal cortex or ventral hippocampus in adult rats.

Authors:  N R Swerdlow; B K Lipska; D R Weinberger; D L Braff; G E Jaskiw; M A Geyer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers.

Authors:  E A Maguire; D G Gadian; I S Johnsrude; C D Good; J Ashburner; R S Frackowiak; C D Frith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Schizophrenia and nicotinic receptors.

Authors:  R Freedman; L E Adler; P Bickford; W Byerley; H Coon; C M Cullum; J M Griffith; J G Harris; S Leonard; C Miller
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection.

Authors:  R Knight
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-09-19       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  7 in total

1.  Distinct neural generators of sensory gating in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Terrance J Williams; Keith H Nuechterlein; Kenneth L Subotnik; Cindy M Yee
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Timing is everything: neural response dynamics during syllable processing and its relation to higher-order cognition in schizophrenia and healthy comparison subjects.

Authors:  Corby L Dale; Anne M Findlay; R Alison Adcock; Mary Vertinski; Melissa Fisher; Alexander Genevsky; Stephanie Aldebot; Karuna Subramaniam; Tracy L Luks; Gregory V Simpson; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Sophia Vinogradov
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Sensory gating disturbances in the spectrum: similarities and differences in schizotypal personality disorder and schizophrenia.

Authors:  Erin A Hazlett; Ethan G Rothstein; Rui Ferreira; Jeremy M Silverman; Larry J Siever; Ann Olincy
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Hippocampus volume and episodic memory in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Robert J Thoma; Mollie Monnig; Faith M Hanlon; Gregory A Miller; Helen Petropoulos; Andrew R Mayer; Ron Yeo; Matt Euler; Per Lysne; Sandra N Moses; Jose M Cañive
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.892

5.  Early sensory processing deficits predict sensitivity to distraction in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jason Smucny; Ann Olincy; Lindsay C Eichman; Emma Lyons; Jason R Tregellas
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Dysfunctional cortical connectivity during the auditory oddball task in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Toshiro Fujimoto; Eiichi Okumura; Kouzou Takeuchi; Atsushi Kodabashi; Toshiaki Otsubo; Katsumi Nakamura; Shinichiro Kamiya; Yuji Higashi; Tadahiko Yuji; Kenichi Honda; Susumu Shimooki; Toshiyo Tamura
Journal:  Open Neuroimag J       Date:  2013-04-05

7.  Modeling the developmental patterns of auditory evoked magnetic fields in children.

Authors:  Rupesh Kotecha; Maria Pardos; Yingying Wang; Ting Wu; Paul Horn; David Brown; Douglas Rose; Ton deGrauw; Jing Xiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.