Literature DB >> 18822891

[Biosafety profile of laboratory workers at three education hospitals in Izmir, Turkey].

Umit Aksoy1, M Hakan Ozdemir, Selma Usluca, Akça Toprak Ergönen.   

Abstract

The laboratory personnel in hospitals are at risk in terms of transmission of various infectious diseases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the knowledge, behavior and attitude of the health personnel who work in one university and two state hospitals in Izmir, Turkey, about biosafety. The study is an observational-sectional study. Participants were selected via random sampling method. The hospitals were visited on workdays determined by the random selection method and all of the personnel (doctor, technician, cleaning-staff) were included to the study. The data were analyzed statistically using Chi square test. Of the 183 participants included in the study, 106 were from Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine Central Laboratory and 77 were from state hospitals. 62.8% of the participants were female, 37.2% were male and mean age of all was 32.8 +/- 6.9 years. 23.5% of the participants stated that they had previously taken education about biosafety (p= 0.002). It was determined that 91.3% of the participants were wearing gloves and 87.4% of them were wearing lab-coat during laboratory studies. A significant difference was observed between the hospitals in terms of use of gloves (p= 0.004). All the participants stated that they wash their hands and 43% of them indicated that their daily hand wash rate was > or = 10 times. It was determined that 38.3% of the participants consumed food or drinks in the laboratory, however, this rate was statistically significantly less in the university hospital laboratory (p= 0.000). The rate of participants who had been subjected to a microorganism in the last six months was 6.6%. Obedience to the biosafety rules in laboratory will not only provide a safer environment but also improve the quality of work. We believe that the results of this study will serve as a guide for future studies on laboratory biosafety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18822891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mikrobiyol Bul        ISSN: 0374-9096            Impact factor:   0.622


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of biosafety precautions in Khartoum state diagnostic laboratories, Sudan.

Authors:  Adel Hussein Elduma
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2012-02-03

2.  Knowledge and practice of biosafety precautions in a developing tertiary care institute of North India.

Authors:  Anju Dubey; Atul Sonker
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2017 Jan-Jun

3.  Unintentional Injuries in the Three References Laboratories: Sana'a, Yemen.

Authors:  Yaser Mohammed Al Eryani; Nawal Nooradain; Kakob Alsharqi; Abeer Murtadha; Abdulwahed Al Serouri; Yousef Khader
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2019-10-09

4.  Biorisk assessment of medical diagnostic laboratories in Nigeria.

Authors:  Bankole Henry Oladeinde; Richard Omoregie; Ikponmwonsa Odia; Eguagie Osareniro Osakue; Odaro Stanley Imade
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2013-04-25

5.  How compliant are technicians with universal safety measures in medical laboratories in Croatia?--A pilot study.

Authors:  Kristina Dukic; Matea Zoric; Petra Pozaic; Jelena Starcic; Marija Culjak; Andrea Saracevic; Marijana Miler
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.313

6.  Occupational safety and health status of medical laboratories in Kajiado County, Kenya.

Authors:  Fridah Ntinyari Tait; Charles Mburu; Joseph Gikunju
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2018-01-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.