Christopher Lo1, Andrew Walsh, Mario Mikulincer, Lucia Gagliese, Camilla Zimmermann, Gary Rodin. 1. Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Princess Margaret Hospital, and Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care Research Division, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. chrislo@uhnresearch.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Attachment security has been identified as an important buffer of distress in patients with cancer and other medical illnesses but current measures have not been adapted for this population who may be older, in long-term stable relationships, and suffering from considerable disease burden. This study reports on (1) the psychometric properties of a modified 36-item Experiences in Close Relationships scale (ECR), adapted for this population; and (2) the validity of a brief 16-item version of our modified scale. METHODS: A modified ECR (ECR-M36) was constructed by rephrasing relevant items to refer more generally to people with whom one feels close, instead of specifically in relation to one's romantic partner(s). Patients with metastatic gastrointestinal (GI) and lung cancer completed the ECR-M36 and other scales tapping self-esteem, social support, and depressive symptoms on two occasions within a period of 4-6 months. Based on factor analyses of the ECR-M36, 16 items were selected to form a brief measure (ECR-M16). RESULTS: Factor analyses of both ECR forms revealed a higher-order factor structure in which four first-order factors (Worrying about Relationships, Frustration about Unavailability, Discomfort with Closeness, Turning Away from Others) loaded onto two second-order factors tapping Attachment Anxiety and Avoidance. Both ECR forms were reliable and valid. CONCLUSION: The ECR-M36 and ECR-M16 are good measures of attachment orientations for use with medically ill, older populations. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OBJECTIVE: Attachment security has been identified as an important buffer of distress in patients with cancer and other medical illnesses but current measures have not been adapted for this population who may be older, in long-term stable relationships, and suffering from considerable disease burden. This study reports on (1) the psychometric properties of a modified 36-item Experiences in Close Relationships scale (ECR), adapted for this population; and (2) the validity of a brief 16-item version of our modified scale. METHODS: A modified ECR (ECR-M36) was constructed by rephrasing relevant items to refer more generally to people with whom one feels close, instead of specifically in relation to one's romantic partner(s). Patients with metastatic gastrointestinal (GI) and lung cancer completed the ECR-M36 and other scales tapping self-esteem, social support, and depressive symptoms on two occasions within a period of 4-6 months. Based on factor analyses of the ECR-M36, 16 items were selected to form a brief measure (ECR-M16). RESULTS: Factor analyses of both ECR forms revealed a higher-order factor structure in which four first-order factors (Worrying about Relationships, Frustration about Unavailability, Discomfort with Closeness, Turning Away from Others) loaded onto two second-order factors tapping Attachment Anxiety and Avoidance. Both ECR forms were reliable and valid. CONCLUSION: The ECR-M36 and ECR-M16 are good measures of attachment orientations for use with medically ill, older populations. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Katharina Scheffold; Rebecca Philipp; Sigrun Vehling; Susan Koranyi; Dorit Engelmann; Frank Schulz-Kindermann; Martin Härter; Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Gary Rodin; Dora Yuen; Ashley Mischitelle; Mark D Minden; Joseph Brandwein; Aaron Schimmer; Charles Marmar; Lucia Gagliese; Christopher Lo; Anne Rydall; Camilla Zimmermann Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2011-11-13 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Christopher P Fagundes; Lisa M Jaremka; Ronald Glaser; Catherine M Alfano; Stephen P Povoski; Adele M Lipari; Doreen M Agnese; Lisa D Yee; William E Carson; William B Farrar; William B Malarkey; Min Chen; Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Christopher P Fagundes; Lisa M Jaremka; William B Malarkey; Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2014-02-17 Impact factor: 3.894