Literature DB >> 18821012

The 76-gene signature defines high-risk patients that benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen therapy.

Yi Zhang1, Anieta M Sieuwerts, Michelle McGreevy, Graham Casey, Tanja Cufer, Angelo Paradiso, Nadia Harbeck, Paul N Span, David G Hicks, Joseph Crowe, Raymond R Tubbs, G Thomas Budd, Joanne Lyons, Fred C G J Sweep, Manfred Schmitt, Francesco Schittulli, Rastko Golouh, Dmitri Talantov, Yixin Wang, John A Foekens.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the benefit from adjuvant systemic tamoxifen therapy in breast cancer risk groups identified by the previously established prognostic 76-gene signature.
METHODS: In 300 lymph node-negative (LNN), estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer patients (136 treated with adjuvant tamoxifen, 164 having received no systemic adjuvant therapy), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) as a function of the 76-gene signature was determined in a multicenter fashion.
RESULTS: In 136 tamoxifen-treated patients, the 76-gene signature identified a group of patients with a poor prognosis [hazard ratio (HR), 4.62; P = 0.0248]. These patients showed a 12.3% absolute benefit of tamoxifen in 10-year DMFS (HR, 0.52; P = 0.0318) compared with untreated high-risk patients. This represented a 71% increase in relative benefit compared with the 7.2% absolute benefit observed for all 300 patients without using the gene signature. In the low-risk group there was no significant 10-year DMFS benefit of tamoxifen.
CONCLUSIONS: The 76-gene signature defines high-risk patients who benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. Although we did not study the value of chemotherapy in this study, low-risk patients identified by the 76-gene signature have a prognosis good enough that chemotherapy would be difficult to justify. The prognosis of these patients is sufficiently good, in fact, that a disease-free benefit for tamoxifen therapy is difficult to prove, though benefits in terms of loco-regional relapse and a reduction in risk for contralateral breast cancer might justify hormonal therapy in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18821012     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0183-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  72 in total

1.  The therapeutic response of ER+/HER2- breast cancers differs according to the molecular Basal or Luminal subtype.

Authors:  François Bertucci; Pascal Finetti; Anthony Goncalves; Daniel Birnbaum
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-03-06

2.  The branched-chain amino acid transaminase 1 sustains growth of antiestrogen-resistant and ERα-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  V Thewes; R Simon; M Hlevnjak; M Schlotter; P Schroeter; K Schmidt; Y Wu; T Anzeneder; W Wang; P Windisch; M Kirchgäßner; N Melling; N Kneisel; R Büttner; U Deuschle; H P Sinn; A Schneeweiss; S Heck; S Kaulfuss; H Hess-Stumpp; J G Okun; G Sauter; A E Lykkesfeldt; M Zapatka; B Radlwimmer; P Lichter; M Tönjes
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Profile of differentially expressed intratumoral cytokines to predict the immune-polarizing side effects of tamoxifen in breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Bailiang Li; Yang Li; Xiao-Yu Wang; Zi-Qiao Yan; Huidi Liu; Gui-Rong Liu; Shu-Lin Liu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  A three-gene model to robustly identify breast cancer molecular subtypes.

Authors:  Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Christine Desmedt; Sherene Loi; Aedin C Culhane; Gianluca Bontempi; John Quackenbush; Christos Sotiriou
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  G0S2 represses PI3K/mTOR signaling and increases sensitivity to PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibitors in breast cancer.

Authors:  Christina Y Yim; Emmanuel Bikorimana; Ema Khan; Joshua M Warzecha; Leah Shin; Jennifer Rodriguez; Ethan Dmitrovsky; Sarah J Freemantle; Michael J Spinella
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Effects of In Utero Exposure to Ethinyl Estradiol on Tamoxifen Resistance and Breast Cancer Recurrence in a Preclinical Model.

Authors:  Leena Hilakivi-Clarke; Anni Wärri; Kerrie B Bouker; Xiyuan Zhang; Katherine L Cook; Lu Jin; Alan Zwart; Nguyen Nguyen; Rong Hu; M Idalia Cruz; Sonia de Assis; Xiao Wang; Jason Xuan; Yue Wang; Bryan Wehrenberg; Robert Clarke
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Tamoxifen Resistance in Breast Cancer Is Regulated by the EZH2-ERα-GREB1 Transcriptional Axis.

Authors:  Zhao Zhang; Mauro E Cenciarini; Cecilia J Proietti; Yanming Wu; Matias Amasino; Tao Hong; Mei Yang; Yiji Liao; Huai-Chin Chiang; Virginia G Kaklamani; Rinath Jeselsohn; Ratna K Vadlamudi; Tim Hui-Ming Huang; Rong Li; Carmine De Angelis; Xiaoyong Fu; Patricia V Elizalde; Rachel Schiff; Myles Brown; Kexin Xu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Minimising immunohistochemical false negative ER classification using a complementary 23 gene expression signature of ER status.

Authors:  Qiyuan Li; Aron C Eklund; Nicolai Juul; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Christopher T Workman; Andrea L Richardson; Zoltan Szallasi; Charles Swanton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Dynamic changes in gene expression in vivo predict prognosis of tamoxifen-treated patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Karen J Taylor; Andrew H Sims; Liang Liang; Dana Faratian; Morwenna Muir; Graeme Walker; Barbara Kuske; J Michael Dixon; David A Cameron; David J Harrison; Simon P Langdon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Improvement of the clinical applicability of the Genomic Grade Index through a qRT-PCR test performed on frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.

Authors:  Jérôme Toussaint; Anieta M Sieuwerts; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Christine Desmedt; Ghizlane Rouas; Adrian L Harris; Denis Larsimont; Martine Piccart; John A Foekens; Virginie Durbecq; Christos Sotiriou
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.