Literature DB >> 18820669

DNA copy number alterations correlate with survival of esophageal adenocarcinoma patients.

Giulia Pasello1, Simona Agata, Laura Bonaldi, Alberto Corradin, Marco Montagna, Rita Zamarchi, Anna Parenti, Matteo Cagol, Giovanni Zaninotto, Alberto Ruol, Ermanno Ancona, Alberto Amadori, Daniela Saggioro.   

Abstract

Despite recent advances in surgical and multidisciplinary treatment, prognosis for patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma remains poor, and the low prognostic significance of pTNM staging suggests that additional parameters are needed. To identify genomic abnormalities characteristic of esophageal adenocarcinoma, a panel of 33 samples obtained at surgery from previously untreated patients were analyzed by muliplex ligation-dependent probe amplification technique. We detected frequent gains of 6p, 8q, 13q, 17q, 20q, and losses of 4q, 5q, 15q, and 18q. When DNA copy number changes were correlated to clinicopathological features of patients no association was found between the number of chromosomal aberrations and gender, age, tumor grade or pTNM staging. However, interestingly, a significant correlation between patient survival and total number of chromosomal aberrations was found when esophageal adenocarcinoma cases were stratified according to the median of survival (20 months) (P=0.002) or the median of aberrations (12 aberrations) (P=0.014). Evaluation of the distribution of gains and losses at the level of single chromosomes indicated that gains on chromosomes 5, 6, 8, 11, 20 and losses on chromosomes 1, 3, 5, 11, and 18 were significantly different in the two survival groups. Furthermore, when single gene imbalances were analyzed in further details, we found that besides alterations that involve genes shared by both survival groups, a few genes (KIAA0170, EMS1, ABCC4, F3, and MIF) were altered only in samples from patients with poor survival. Thus, we established a good correlation between the total number of chromosomal alterations and survival, suggesting that the estimation of total imbalances might represent an additional indicator of disease outcome. In addition, the finding of alterations specific for the more aggressive esophageal adenocarcinoma subset might represent promising biomarkers to increase the accuracy of clinical outcome prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18820669     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2008.150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  12 in total

1.  Growth inhibition, morphology change, and cell cycle alterations in NFBD1-depleted human esophageal cancer cells.

Authors:  Zhengmei Yang; Youquan Bu; Changdong Wang; Geli Liu; Fangzhou Song
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 3.396

2.  Integrative genomics identified RFC3 as an amplified candidate oncogene in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  William W Lockwood; Kelsie L Thu; Lin Lin; Larissa A Pikor; Raj Chari; Wan L Lam; David G Beer
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Biomarkers in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: predictors of progression and prognosis.

Authors:  Chin-Ann J Ong; Pierre Lao-Sirieix; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Integrated molecular analysis reveals complex interactions between genomic and epigenomic alterations in esophageal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  DunFa Peng; Yan Guo; Heidi Chen; Shilin Zhao; Kay Washington; TianLing Hu; Yu Shyr; Wael El-Rifai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  GERD-Barrett-Adenocarcinoma: Do We Have Suitable Prognostic and Predictive Molecular Markers?

Authors:  Romana Illig; Eckhard Klieser; Tobias Kiesslich; Daniel Neureiter
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Rebecca A Burrell; Sarah E McClelland; David Endesfelder; Petra Groth; Marie-Christine Weller; Nadeem Shaikh; Enric Domingo; Nnennaya Kanu; Sally M Dewhurst; Eva Gronroos; Su Kit Chew; Andrew J Rowan; Arne Schenk; Michal Sheffer; Michael Howell; Maik Kschischo; Axel Behrens; Thomas Helleday; Jiri Bartek; Ian P Tomlinson; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Reduced genomic tumor heterogeneity after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is related to favorable outcome in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Askar Obulkasim; Bauke Ylstra; Hendrik F van Essen; Christian Benner; Sally Stenning; Ruth Langley; William Allum; David Cunningham; Imran Inam; Lindsay C Hewitt; Nicolas P West; Gerrit A Meijer; Mark A van de Wiel; Heike I Grabsch
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-07-12

8.  Disseminated tumour cells with highly aberrant genomes are linked to poor prognosis in operable oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sarah Schumacher; Christoph Bartenhagen; Martin Hoffmann; Daniel Will; Johannes C Fischer; Stephan E Baldus; Christian Vay; Georg Fluegen; Levent Dizdar; Daniel Vallböhmer; Christoph A Klein; Wolfram T Knoefel; Nikolas H Stoecklein; Birte Möhlendick
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Genomic similarity between gastroesophageal junction and esophageal Barrett's adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Daysha Ferrer-Torres; Derek J Nancarrow; Rork Kuick; Dafydd G Thomas; Ernest Nadal; Jules Lin; Andrew C Chang; Rishindra M Reddy; Mark B Orringer; Jeremy M G Taylor; Thomas D Wang; David G Beer
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-23

Review 10.  ABC Transporters and Their Role in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  David Vrana; Viktor Hlavac; Veronika Brynychova; Radka Vaclavikova; Cestmir Neoral; Jiri Vrba; Rene Aujesky; Marcel Matzenauer; Bohuslav Melichar; Pavel Soucek
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.