Literature DB >> 18820506

A comparison of alternative item weighting strategies on the data gathering component of a clinical skills performance assessment.

Nilufer Kahraman1, Brian E Clauser, Melissa J Margolis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Checklist scores used to produce the data gathering score on the Step 2 CS examination are currently weighted using an algorithm based on expert judgment about the importance of the item. The present research was designed to compare this approach with alternative weighting strategies.
METHOD: Scores from 21,140 examinees who took the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 between May 2006 and February 2007 were subjected to five weighting models: (1) a regression weights model, (2) a factor loading weights model, (3) a standardized response model, (4) an equal weights model, and (5) the operational expert-judgment weights model.
RESULTS: Alternative weighting procedures may have a significant impact on the reliability and validity of checklist scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the current weighting procedure is useful, and the regression-based model holds promise for practical application. The regression-based model produces scores that are more reliable than those produced by the current procedure and more strongly related to the external criteria.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18820506     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318183e1ac

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  1 in total

1.  Beyond standard checklist assessment: Question sequence may impact student performance.

Authors:  Jeff LaRochelle; Steven J Durning; John R Boulet; Cees van der Vleuten; Jeroen van Merrienboer; Jeroen Donkers
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2016-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.