Literature DB >> 18820493

Measurement characteristics of content-parallel single-best-answer and extended-matching questions in relation to number and source of options.

David B Swanson1, Kathleen Z Holtzman, Krista Allbee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous research showed that extended-matching questions (EMQs) with eight options per set resulted in better score precision than EMQs with larger numbers of options or independent single-best-answer items (A-type) with five options. This study extends previous work using smaller numbers of options.
METHOD: Ninety-six questions were presented in two formats on United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2: as two-item EMQ sets and as independent A-types. Four versions of EMQs were used: five- and eight-option versions with options selected using statistics, and five- and eight-option versions with options selected by physicians. Seven A-type versions were used: three-, four-, five-, and eight-option versions with options selected using statistics, and three-, four-, and five-option versions with options selected by physicians.
RESULTS: Items with more options were harder, required more time to complete, and had similar item discrimination. Option sets selected by physicians were easier, slightly more discriminating, and required less testing time.
CONCLUSIONS: A-types with four or five options and EMQs with eight options make more efficient use of testing time. Provision of response statistics to content experts does not seem necessary to guide option selection.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18820493     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318183e5bb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  7 in total

1.  Assessment methods in undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  Nadia M Al-Wardy
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2010-07-19

2.  Exploring Clinical Reasoning Strategies and Test-Taking Behaviors During Clinical Vignette Style Multiple-Choice Examinations: A Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Brian Sanjay Heist; Jed David Gonzalo; Steven Durning; Dario Torre; David Michael Elnicki
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-12

3.  Rarely selected distractors in high stakes medical multiple-choice examinations and their recognition by item authors: a simulation and survey.

Authors:  Anja Rogausch; Rainer Hofer; René Krebs
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Analysis of MCQ and distractor use in a large first year Health Faculty Foundation Program: assessing the effects of changing from five to four options.

Authors:  Nicolette Fozzard; Andrew Pearson; Eugene du Toit; Helen Naug; William Wen; Ian R Peak
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.

Authors:  Jane Holland; Robin O'Sullivan; Richard Arnett
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  An investigation into the optimal number of distractors in single-best answer exams.

Authors:  James M Kilgour; Saadia Tayyaba
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.853

7.  Adding to the debate on the numbers of options for MCQs: the case for not being limited to MCQs with three, four or five options.

Authors:  Mike Tweed
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.