Literature DB >> 18820340

Participant experiences in a workplace pedometer-based physical activity program.

Nicola Lauzon1, Catherine B Chan, Anita M Myers, Catrine Tudor-Locke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited process evaluation of pedometer-based interventions has been reported.
METHODS: Feedback via focus groups (n=38) and exit questionnaires (n=68) was used to examine participants' experiences in a group-based, pedometer-based physical activity (PA) program delivered in the workplace.
RESULTS: The pedometer was described as a useful tool for increasing awareness of PA, providing motivation and visual feedback, and encouraging conversation and support among participants and others such as family and friends. Group meetings provided motivation and social support, as did participation by coworkers. Self-selected goals, self-selected PA strategies, and recording of steps/d were also important.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the importance of social support as a mediating variable in changing PA behavior, future pedometer-based programs might benefit from including a group-based component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18820340     DOI: 10.1123/jpah.5.5.675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Act Health        ISSN: 1543-3080


  16 in total

1.  Developing a Fitbit-supported lifestyle physical activity intervention for depressed alcohol dependent women.

Authors:  Ana M Abrantes; Claire E Blevins; Cynthia L Battle; Jennifer P Read; Alan L Gordon; Michael D Stein
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2017-07-08

2.  Physical Activity for Campus Employees: A University Worksite Wellness Program.

Authors:  Carling E Butler; B Ruth Clark; Tamara L Burlis; Jacqueline C Castillo; Susan B Racette
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2014-06-04

3.  Promoting Lifestyle Physical Activity: Experiences with the First Step Program.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2009-07-01

4.  Why do pedometers work?: a reflection upon the factors related to successfully increasing physical activity.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Lesley Lutes
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Pedometer use among adults at high risk of type 2 diabetes, Finland, 2007-2008.

Authors:  Eveliina E Korkiakangas; Maija A Alahuhta; Päivi M Husman; Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; Anja M Taanila; Jaana H Laitinen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  "ASUKI Step" pedometer intervention in university staff: rationale and design.

Authors:  Barbara E Ainsworth; Cheryl Der Ananian; Ali Soroush; Jenelle Walker; Pamela Swan; Eric Poortvliet; Agneta Yngve
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  The effects of physical activity feedback on behavior and awareness in employees: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Karen Van Hoye; Filip Boen; Johan Lefevre
Journal:  Int J Telemed Appl       Date:  2012-09-25

8.  Investigating the effect of a 3-month workplace-based pedometer-driven walking programme on health-related quality of life in meat processing workers: a feasibility study within a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Suliman Mansi; Stephan Milosavljevic; Steve Tumilty; Paul Hendrick; Chris Higgs; David G Baxter
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Engagement and Nonusage Attrition With a Free Physical Activity Promotion Program: The Case of 10,000 Steps Australia.

Authors:  Diana Guertler; Corneel Vandelanotte; Morwenna Kirwan; Mitch J Duncan
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Validity of the SenseWear armband step count measure during controlled and free-living conditions.

Authors:  Joey Allen Lee; Kelly Rian Laurson
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.