Literature DB >> 18817948

Genes and environment - striking the fine balance between sophisticated biomonitoring and true functional environmental genomics.

Christian E W Steinberg1, Stephen R Stürzenbaum, Ralph Menzel.   

Abstract

This article provides an overview how the application of the gene profiling (mainly via microarray technology) can be used in different organisms to address issues of environmental importance. Only recently, environmental sciences, including ecotoxicology, and molecular biology have started to mutually fertilize each other. This conceptual blend has enabled the identification of the interaction between molecular events and whole animal and population responses. Likewise, striking the fine balance between biomonitoring and functional environmental genomics will allow legislative and administrative measures to be based on a more robust platform. The application of DNA microarrays to ecotoxicogenomics links ecotoxicological effects of exposure with expression profiles of several thousand genes. The gene expression profiles are altered during toxicity, as either a direct or indirect result of toxicant exposure and the comparison of numerous specific expression profiles facilitates the differentiation between intoxication and true responses to environmental stressors. Furthermore, the application of microarrays provides the means to identify complex pathways and strategies that an exposed organism applies in response to environmental stressors. This review will present evidence that the widespread phenomenon of hormesis has a genetic basis that goes beyond an adaptive response. Some more practical advantages emerge: the toxicological assessment of complex mixtures, such as effluents or sediments, as well as drugs seems feasible, especially when classical ecotoxicological tests have failed. The review of available information demonstrates the advantages of microarray application to environmental issues spanning from bacteria, over algae and spermatophytes, to invertebrates (nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, crustacea Daphnia spp., earthworms), and various fish species. Microarrays have also highlighted why populations of a given species respond differently to similar contaminations. Furthermore, this review points at inherent limits of microarrays which may not yet have been properly addressed, namely epigenetics, which may explain heritable variation observed in natural population that cannot be explained by differences in the DNA sequence. Finally, the review will address promising future molecular biological developments which may supersede the microarray technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18817948     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.07.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  23 in total

1.  Reference genes for qPCR assays in toxic metal and salinity stress in two flatworm model organisms.

Authors:  Michelle Plusquin; Olivier DeGheselle; Ann Cuypers; Ellen Geerdens; Andromeda Van Roten; Tom Artois; Karen Smeets
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  Microarray analyses of shrimp immune responses.

Authors:  Takashi Aoki; Han-Ching Wang; Sasimanas Unajak; Mudjekeewis D Santos; Hidehiro Kondo; Ikuo Hirono
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Transcriptomic analyses in a benthic fish exposed to contaminated estuarine sediments through laboratory and in situ bioassays.

Authors:  Pedro M Costa; Célia Miguel; Sandra Caeiro; Jorge Lobo; Marta Martins; Ana M Ferreira; Miguel Caetano; Carlos Vale; T A DelValls; Maria H Costa
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Hepatic proteome changes in Solea senegalensis exposed to contaminated estuarine sediments: a laboratory and in situ survey.

Authors:  Pedro M Costa; Eduardo Chicano-Gálvez; Sandra Caeiro; Jorge Lobo; Marta Martins; Ana M Ferreira; Miguel Caetano; Carlos Vale; José Alhama-Carmona; Juan Lopez-Barea; T Angel DelValls; Maria H Costa
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 5.  Caenorhabditis elegans as an emerging model system in environmental epigenetics.

Authors:  Caren Weinhouse; Lisa Truong; Joel N Meyer; Patrick Allard
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.216

6.  Linking mechanistic and behavioral responses to sublethal esfenvalerate exposure in the endangered delta smelt; Hypomesus transpacificus (Fam. Osmeridae).

Authors:  Richard E Connon; Juergen Geist; Janice Pfeiff; Alexander V Loguinov; Leandro S D'Abronzo; Henri Wintz; Christopher D Vulpe; Inge Werner
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Metabolomic and transcriptomic analysis of the rice response to the bacterial blight pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae.

Authors:  Theodore R Sana; Steve Fischer; Gert Wohlgemuth; Anjali Katrekar; Ki-Hong Jung; Pam C Ronald; Oliver Fiehn
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 4.290

8.  Signal transduction disturbance related to hepatocarcinogenesis in mouse by prolonged exposure to Nanjing drinking water.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Jie Sun; Yan Zhang; Shupei Cheng; Xiaowei Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Transcriptional responses to environmental metal exposure in wild yellow perch (Perca flavescens) collected in lakes with differing environmental metal concentrations (Cd, Cu, Ni).

Authors:  Fabien Pierron; Vincent Bourret; Jérôme St-Cyr; Peter G C Campbell; Louis Bernatchez; Patrice Couture
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  Extraction of RNA from Ca-alginate-encapsulated yeast for transcriptional profiling.

Authors:  Arthur L Kruckeberg; Saisubramanian Nagarajan; Kate McInnerney; Frank Rosenzweig
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 3.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.