Literature DB >> 18817792

Left and right memory revisited: electrophysiological investigations of hemispheric asymmetries at retrieval.

Karen M Evans1, Kara D Federmeier.   

Abstract

Hemispheric differences in the use of memory retrieval cues were examined in a continuous recognition design, using visual half-field presentation to bias the processing of test words. A speeded recognition task revealed general accuracy and response time advantages for items whose test presentation was biased to the left hemisphere. A second experiment recorded event-related brain potentials in the same design and replicated these behavioral effects, but found no electrophysiological support for the hypothesis that test words biased to the left hemisphere elicit superior recognition. Instead, successful retrieval was accompanied by memory components of identical strength regardless of test field. That robust visual field effects in response accuracy and speed were not mimicked in memory components that generally do correlate with such behavioral differences suggests that patterns in overt responses may be dominated by the left hemisphere's superior ability to apprehend words. Differences between the data pattern observed in the present study with lateralized retrieval and that in a prior study with lateralized encoding [Evans, K. M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2007). The memory that's right and the memory that's left: Event-related potentials reveal hemispheric asymmetries in the encoding and retention of verbal information. Neuropsychologia 45(8), 1777-1790.] support the notion that hemispheric processing is highly integrated in the intact brain, and highlight the need to treat lateralization at different stages as distinct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18817792      PMCID: PMC2682693          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  41 in total

1.  Short- and long-delay intracranial ERP repetition effects dissociate memory systems in the human brain.

Authors:  F Guillem; A Rougier; B Claverie
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: a selective review.

Authors:  D Friedman; R Johnson
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 2.769

3.  Hemispheric asymmetry in the induction of false memories.

Authors:  Y Ito
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2001-10

4.  Word recognition as a function of retinal locus.

Authors:  M MISHKIN; D G GORGAYS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1952-01

5.  Hemispheric specialization in human dorsal frontal cortex and medial temporal lobe for verbal and nonverbal memory encoding.

Authors:  W M Kelley; F M Miezin; K B McDermott; R L Buckner; M E Raichle; N J Cohen; J M Ollinger; E Akbudak; T E Conturo; A Z Snyder; S E Petersen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  The effect of retention interval upon hemispheric processes in recognition memory.

Authors:  J Coney; S Macdonald
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 7.  Laterality differences in perception: a review.

Authors:  M J White
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Abstract visual-form representations in the left cerebral hemisphere.

Authors:  C J Marsolek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: positron emission tomography findings.

Authors:  E Tulving; S Kapur; F I Craik; M Moscovitch; S Houle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  2 in total

1.  Hemispheric differences in orthographic and semantic processing as revealed by event-related potentials.

Authors:  Danielle S Dickson; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  ERP Indices of Stimulus Prediction in Letter Sequences.

Authors:  Edith Kaan; Evan Carlisle
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2014-10-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.