Literature DB >> 18817439

Emulsion templated scaffolds that include gelatin and glycosaminoglycans.

Andrea Barbetta1, Mara Massimi, Biancalucia Di Rosario, Stefania Nardecchia, Marianna De Colli, Laura Conti Devirgiliis, Mariella Dentini.   

Abstract

Gelatin is one of the most commonly used biopolymer for creating cellular scaffolds due to its innocuous nature. To create stable gelatin scaffolds at physiological temperature (37 degrees C), chemical cross-linking is a necessary step. In a previous paper (Biomacromolecules 2006, 7, 3059-3068), cross-linking was carried out by either radical polymerization of the methacrylated derivative of gelatin (GMA) or through the formation of isopeptide bonds catalyzed by transglutaminase. The method of scaffold production was based on emulsion templating in which an organic phase is dispersed in the form of discrete droplets into a continuous aqueous solution of the biopolymer. Both kinds of scaffolds were tested as culture medium for hepatocytes. It turned out that the enzymatic cross-linked scaffold performed superiorily in this respect, even though it was mechanically less stable than the GMA scaffold. In the present paper, in an attempt to improve the biocompatibility of the GMA-based scaffold, biopolymers present in the extracellular matrix (ECM) were included in scaffold formulation, namely, chondroitin sulfate and hyaluronic acid. These biopolymers were derivatized with methacrylic moieties to undergo radical polymerization together with GMA. The morphology of the scaffolds was tuned to some extent by varying the volume fraction of the internal phase and to a larger extent by inducing a controlled destabilization of the precursor emulsion through the use of additives. In this way, scaffolds with 44% of the void volume attributable to voids with a diameter exceeding 60 microm and with 79% of the interconnect area attributable to interconnects with a diameter exceeding 20 microm in diameter could be successfully synthesized. To test whether the inclusion of ECM components into scaffold formulation resolves in an improvement of their biocompatibility with respect to GMA scaffolds, hepatocytes were seeded on both kinds of scaffolds and cell viability and function assays were carried out and compared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18817439     DOI: 10.1021/bm800599d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomacromolecules        ISSN: 1525-7797            Impact factor:   6.988


  7 in total

1.  Hydroxyapatite/gelatin/gellan sponges as nanocomposite scaffolds for bone reconstruction.

Authors:  Niccoletta Barbani; Giulio D Guerra; Caterina Cristallini; Patrizia Urciuoli; Riccardo Avvisati; Alessandro Sala; Elisabetta Rosellini
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Recent advances in 2D and 3D in vitro systems using primary hepatocytes, alternative hepatocyte sources and non-parenchymal liver cells and their use in investigating mechanisms of hepatotoxicity, cell signaling and ADME.

Authors:  Patricio Godoy; Nicola J Hewitt; Ute Albrecht; Melvin E Andersen; Nariman Ansari; Sudin Bhattacharya; Johannes Georg Bode; Jennifer Bolleyn; Christoph Borner; Jan Böttger; Albert Braeuning; Robert A Budinsky; Britta Burkhardt; Neil R Cameron; Giovanni Camussi; Chong-Su Cho; Yun-Jaie Choi; J Craig Rowlands; Uta Dahmen; Georg Damm; Olaf Dirsch; María Teresa Donato; Jian Dong; Steven Dooley; Dirk Drasdo; Rowena Eakins; Karine Sá Ferreira; Valentina Fonsato; Joanna Fraczek; Rolf Gebhardt; Andrew Gibson; Matthias Glanemann; Chris E P Goldring; María José Gómez-Lechón; Geny M M Groothuis; Lena Gustavsson; Christelle Guyot; David Hallifax; Seddik Hammad; Adam Hayward; Dieter Häussinger; Claus Hellerbrand; Philip Hewitt; Stefan Hoehme; Hermann-Georg Holzhütter; J Brian Houston; Jens Hrach; Kiyomi Ito; Hartmut Jaeschke; Verena Keitel; Jens M Kelm; B Kevin Park; Claus Kordes; Gerd A Kullak-Ublick; Edward L LeCluyse; Peng Lu; Jennifer Luebke-Wheeler; Anna Lutz; Daniel J Maltman; Madlen Matz-Soja; Patrick McMullen; Irmgard Merfort; Simon Messner; Christoph Meyer; Jessica Mwinyi; Dean J Naisbitt; Andreas K Nussler; Peter Olinga; Francesco Pampaloni; Jingbo Pi; Linda Pluta; Stefan A Przyborski; Anup Ramachandran; Vera Rogiers; Cliff Rowe; Celine Schelcher; Kathrin Schmich; Michael Schwarz; Bijay Singh; Ernst H K Stelzer; Bruno Stieger; Regina Stöber; Yuichi Sugiyama; Ciro Tetta; Wolfgang E Thasler; Tamara Vanhaecke; Mathieu Vinken; Thomas S Weiss; Agata Widera; Courtney G Woods; Jinghai James Xu; Kathy M Yarborough; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Formulation and polymerization of foamed 1,4-BDDMA-in-water emulsions.

Authors:  Miriam Lucia Dabrowski; Martin Hamann; Cosima Stubenrauch
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 4.  Physiologically relevant microsystems to study viral infection in the human liver.

Authors:  Dennis McDuffie; David Barr; Ashutosh Agarwal; Emmanuel Thomas
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 6.064

5.  Click-crosslinkable and photodegradable gelatin hydrogels for cytocompatible optical cell manipulation in natural environment.

Authors:  Masato Tamura; Fumiki Yanagawa; Shinji Sugiura; Toshiyuki Takagi; Kimio Sumaru; Toshiyuki Kanamori
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Polyester type polyHIPE scaffolds with an interconnected porous structure for cartilage regeneration.

Authors:  Jakob Naranda; Maja Sušec; Uroš Maver; Lidija Gradišnik; Mario Gorenjak; Andreja Vukasović; Alan Ivković; Marjan Slak Rupnik; Matjaž Vogrin; Peter Krajnc
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Porous Polymers from High Internal Phase Emulsions as Scaffolds for Biological Applications.

Authors:  Stanko Kramer; Neil R Cameron; Peter Krajnc
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.329

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.