OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to estimate fetal blood pressure non-invasively from two-dimensional color Doppler-derived aortic blood flow and diameter waveforms, and to compare the results with invasively derived human fetal blood pressures available from the literature. METHODS: Aortic pressures were calculated from digitally recorded color Doppler cineloops of the fetal descending aorta by applying the Womersley model in combination with the two-element Windkessel model, assuming constant pulse wave velocity during the second half of pregnancy. The results were compared with invasively derived human fetal blood pressures obtained from the literature. RESULTS: In 21 normal pregnancies the estimated mean aortic pressure regression line increased linearly from 28 mmHg at 20 weeks of gestation to 45 mmHg at 40 weeks of gestation. The pulse pressure based on the regression line increased linearly from 21 mmHg at 20 weeks of gestation to 29 mmHg at 40 weeks of gestation. The aortic compliance exhibited a log linear relationship with the gestational age and a statistically significant eightfold increase was observed between 20 and 40 weeks. The aortic downstream peripheral resistance exhibited an exponentially decaying relationship across the same gestational age range. Non-invasively derived aortic systolic and diastolic aortic pressures were comparable with previously reported invasively derived systolic and diastolic umbilical arterial pressures; however, the mean pressures differed significantly from those reported in the umbilical artery in a separate study. The aortic systolic pressures calculated in this study were significantly higher than invasively derived left ventricular systolic pressures that have been previously reported in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of estimating arterial blood pressure in the human fetus. The method described is of potential use in assessing fetal blood pressure non-invasively, particularly for studying relative changes with time.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to estimate fetal blood pressure non-invasively from two-dimensional color Doppler-derived aortic blood flow and diameter waveforms, and to compare the results with invasively derived human fetal blood pressures available from the literature. METHODS: Aortic pressures were calculated from digitally recorded color Doppler cineloops of the fetal descending aorta by applying the Womersley model in combination with the two-element Windkessel model, assuming constant pulse wave velocity during the second half of pregnancy. The results were compared with invasively derived human fetal blood pressures obtained from the literature. RESULTS: In 21 normal pregnancies the estimated mean aortic pressure regression line increased linearly from 28 mmHg at 20 weeks of gestation to 45 mmHg at 40 weeks of gestation. The pulse pressure based on the regression line increased linearly from 21 mmHg at 20 weeks of gestation to 29 mmHg at 40 weeks of gestation. The aortic compliance exhibited a log linear relationship with the gestational age and a statistically significant eightfold increase was observed between 20 and 40 weeks. The aortic downstream peripheral resistance exhibited an exponentially decaying relationship across the same gestational age range. Non-invasively derived aortic systolic and diastolic aortic pressures were comparable with previously reported invasively derived systolic and diastolic umbilical arterial pressures; however, the mean pressures differed significantly from those reported in the umbilical artery in a separate study. The aortic systolic pressures calculated in this study were significantly higher than invasively derived left ventricular systolic pressures that have been previously reported in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of estimating arterial blood pressure in the human fetus. The method described is of potential use in assessing fetal blood pressure non-invasively, particularly for studying relative changes with time.
Authors: Andrea Leonard; Alessandro Bertero; Joseph D Powers; Kevin M Beussman; Shiv Bhandari; Michael Regnier; Charles E Murry; Nathan J Sniadecki Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2018-03-28 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Luís Guedes-Martins; Ana Cunha; Joaquim Saraiva; Ana Rita-Gaio; Ana S Cerdeira; Filipe Macedo; Henrique Almeida Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2014-01-27 Impact factor: 2.062
Authors: Lewis J Renshall; Mark R Dilworth; Susan L Greenwood; Colin P Sibley; Mark Wareing Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2014-07-23 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Rosalind Pratt; J Ciaran Hutchinson; Andrew Melbourne; Maria A Zuluaga; Alex Virasami; Tom Vercauteren; Sebastien Ourselin; Neil J Sebire; Owen J Arthurs; Anna L David Journal: Placenta Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 3.481