Literature DB >> 18816262

Importance of isolation and biotypization of Gardnerella vaginalis in diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Fatima Numanović1, Mirsada Hukić, Mahmud Nurkić, Merima Gegić, Zineta Delibegović, Alma Imamović, Selma Pasić.   

Abstract

The natural habitat of Gardnerella vaginalis is a vagina since it could be located among 69% of women who have no signs of vaginal infection and in the vagina of as many as 13.5% girls. G. vaginalis is almost certainly identified among women diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis as well as in the urethra of their sexual partner. The increase in prevalence and concentration of G. vaginalis among patients diagnosed with this syndrome confirms that G. vaginalis plays a significant role in its pathogenesis. In our research, based on Amsel criteria for three or more clinical signs of bacterial vaginosis, it was diagnosed in 20.5% of women with subjective problems of vaginal infection, and in 48.80% of women with subjective symptoms characteristic of this disease. G. vaginalis was isolated from vaginal secretion of women without clinical signs characteristic of bacterial vaginosis. In 2.58% of cases it was solitary, while in 1.28% it was found in combination with other aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and, in 1.28% women combined with Candida albicans. The isolation of G. vaginalis was significantly increased (p<0.05) in the group of women with clinical signs of bacterial vaginosis in comparison to the group of women without these signs. Frequent recurrence of bacterial vaginosis, which is found in 20-30% of women within a three months treatment, is explained as reinfection with other biotype of G. vaginalis, different from a source biotype or as a consequence of wrong treatment. Following Piot biotype scheme, biotypes 2., 3. and 7. G. vaginalis are significantly more often isolated from women who suffer from bacterial vaginosis. Biotype 7. G. vaginalis, isolated from the group of women without clinical signs of bacterial vaginosis, accounted for 2.58% cases. Following Benit biotype scheme, biotypes IVa, IVc and IIc were identified in 12.90% cases, while biotypes IIIa, IIa, Ia, IVb, IIb were found in 6.45% cases. Lipase-positive isolates of G. vaginalis were significantly more frequently accompanied by the syndrome of bacterial vaginosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18816262      PMCID: PMC5694681          DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2008.2932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci        ISSN: 1512-8601            Impact factor:   3.363


  16 in total

1.  Haemophilus vaginalis vaginitis: a newly defined specific infection previously classified non-specific vaginitis.

Authors:  H L GARDNER; C D DUKES
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1955-05       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  [A comparison of 2 clinical laboratory methods in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis].

Authors:  A González-Pedraza-Avilés; A Inzunza-Montiel; C Ortiz-Zaragoza; R Ponce-Rosas; A Irigoyen-Coria
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  1997-04-30       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  The role of Gardnerella vaginalis in nonspecific vaginitis in intra uterine contraceptive device users.

Authors:  B K Gupta; R Kumar; R Sofat; S Khurana
Journal:  Indian J Pathol Microbiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 0.740

4.  A modified scheme for biotyping Gardnerella vaginalis.

Authors:  R Benito; J A Vazquez; S Berron; A Fenoll; J A Saez-Neito
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Vaginal colonization with Corynebacterium vaginale (Haemophilus vaginalis).

Authors:  W M McCormack; C H Hayes; B Rosner; J R Evrard; V A Crockett; S Alpert; S H Zinner
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation.

Authors:  R P Nugent; M A Krohn; S L Hillier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Selective differential human blood bilayer media for isolation of Gardnerella (Haemophilus) vaginalis.

Authors:  P A Totten; R Amsel; J Hale; P Piot; K K Holmes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations.

Authors:  R Amsel; P A Totten; C A Spiegel; K C Chen; D Eschenbach; K K Holmes
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Biotypes of Gardnerella vaginalis.

Authors:  P Piot; E Van Dyck; M Peeters; J Hale; P A Totten; K K Holmes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Gardnerella vaginalis: characteristics, clinical considerations, and controversies.

Authors:  B W Catlin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 26.132

View more
  7 in total

1.  Drawing the line between commensal and pathogenic Gardnerella vaginalis through genome analysis and virulence studies.

Authors:  Michael D Harwich; Joao M Alves; Gregory A Buck; Jerome F Strauss; Jennifer L Patterson; Aminat T Oki; Philippe H Girerd; Kimberly K Jefferson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  Bacterial vaginosis presence in sexually active women in Tuzla Canton area.

Authors:  Fatima Numanović; Mirsada Hukić; Merima Gegić; Mahmud Nukić; Zineta Delibegović; Selma Pasić; Elsada Cicko
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.363

3.  Resolution and Cooccurrence Patterns of Gardnerella leopoldii, G. swidsinskii, G. piotii, and G. vaginalis within the Vaginal Microbiome.

Authors:  Janet E Hill; Arianne Y K Albert
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Exploring the diversity of Gardnerella vaginalis in the genitourinary tract microbiota of monogamous couples through subtle nucleotide variation.

Authors:  A Murat Eren; Marcela Zozaya; Christopher M Taylor; Scot E Dowd; David H Martin; Michael J Ferris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Quantitation of all Four Gardnerella vaginalis Clades Detects Abnormal Vaginal Microbiota Characteristic of Bacterial Vaginosis More Accurately than Putative G. vaginalis Sialidase A Gene Count.

Authors:  Elena Shipitsyna; Anna Krysanova; Guzel Khayrullina; Kira Shalepo; Alevtina Savicheva; Alexander Guschin; Magnus Unemo
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.074

6.  Resolution and characterization of distinct cpn60-based subgroups of Gardnerella vaginalis in the vaginal microbiota.

Authors:  Teenus Paramel Jayaprakash; John J Schellenberg; Janet E Hill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Focusing the diversity of Gardnerella vaginalis through the lens of ecotypes.

Authors:  Omar E Cornejo; Roxana J Hickey; Haruo Suzuki; Larry J Forney
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 5.183

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.