Literature DB >> 18814808

The effects of social structure and sex-biased transmission on macroparasite infection.

S E Perkins1, M F Ferrari, P J Hudson.   

Abstract

Mathematical models of disease dynamics tend to assume that individuals within a population mix at random and so transmission is random, and yet, in reality social structure creates heterogeneous contact patterns. We investigated the effect of heterogeneity in host contact patterns on potential macroparasite transmission by first quantifying the level of assortativity in a socially structured wild rodent population (Apodemus flavicollis) with respect to the directly-transmitted macroparasitic helminth, Heligmosomoides polygyrus. We found the population to be disassortatively mixed (i.e. male mice mixing with female mice more often than same sex mixing) at a constant level over time. The macroparasite H. polygyrus has previously been shown to exhibit male-biased transmission so we used a Susceptible-Infected (SI) mathematical model to simulate the effect of increasing strengths of male-biased transmission on the prevalence of the macroparasite using empirically-derived transmission networks. When transmission was equal between the sexes the model predicted macroparasite prevalence to be 73% and infection was male biased (82% of infection in the male mice). With a male-bias in transmission ten times that of the females, the expected macroparasite prevalence was 50% and was equally prevalent in both sexes, results that both most closely resembled empirical dynamics. As such, disassortative mixing alone did not produce macroparasite dynamics analogous to those from empirical observations; a strong male-bias in transmission was also required. We discuss the relevance of our results in the context of network models for transmission dynamics and control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18814808     DOI: 10.1017/S0031182008000449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitology        ISSN: 0031-1820            Impact factor:   3.234


  12 in total

1.  Female host sex-biased parasitism with the rodent stomach nematode Mastophorus muris in wild bank voles (Myodes glareolus).

Authors:  Maciej Grzybek; Anna Bajer; Jolanta Behnke-Borowczyk; Mohammed Al-Sarraf; Jerzy M Behnke
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  The effect of disease on the evolution of females and the genetic basis of sex in populations with cytoplasmic male sterility.

Authors:  Ian Miller; Emily Bruns
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Who infects whom? Social networks and tuberculosis transmission in wild meerkats.

Authors:  Julian A Drewe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Viral infection causes sex-specific changes in fruit fly social aggregation behaviour.

Authors:  Jonathon A Siva-Jothy; Pedro F Vale
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Associations between innate immune function and ectoparasites in wild rodent hosts.

Authors:  Evelyn C Rynkiewicz; Hadas Hawlena; Lance A Durden; Michael W Hastriter; Gregory E Demas; Keith Clay
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Relationships between host body condition and immunocompetence, not host sex, best predict parasite burden in a bat-helminth system.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Warburton; Christopher A Pearl; Maarten J Vonhof
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 2.289

7.  Refuge sharing network predicts ectoparasite load in a lizard.

Authors:  Stephan T Leu; Peter M Kappeler; C Michael Bull
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Interspecific social networks promote information transmission in wild songbirds.

Authors:  Damien R Farine; Lucy M Aplin; Ben C Sheldon; William Hoppitt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Patterns of ectoparasitism in North American red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus): Sex-biases, seasonality, age, and effects on male body condition.

Authors:  Jesse E H Patterson; Peter Neuhaus; Susan J Kutz; Kathreen E Ruckstuhl
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.674

Review 10.  Networks and the ecology of parasite transmission: A framework for wildlife parasitology.

Authors:  Stephanie S Godfrey
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.674

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.