Literature DB >> 18814046

Anthropometric characteristics and mammographic parenchymal patterns in post-menopausal women: a population-based study in Northern Greece.

Elena Riza1, Dionysios-Dennis Remoundos, Evangelia Bakali, Efi Karadedou-Zafiriadou, Dimitrios Linos, Athena Linos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of various anthropometric determinants on mammographic patterns at postmenopausal ages, accounting for reproductive differences.
METHODS: Mammograms from 900 post-menopausal women classified into high- (P2/DY) versus low-density (N1/P1) groups using the Wolfe criteria were associated with changes in body figure, reported and measured height and weight, body mass index, hip, waist and chest circumferences, chest/hip ratio, waist/hip ratio (WHR), breast size, and leg length. Reproductive factors included ages at menarche, first pregnancy and menopause, years since menopause, parity, and breast feeding duration. The study was nested within a large cross-sectional survey of a population-based breast cancer screening program in Northern Greece.
RESULTS: Increasing chest circumference (p = 0.002), change in body build during adulthood to a heavier profile (p = 0.04), and heavy somatotype at age 18 (p = 0.007) were the anthropometric determinants significantly associated with low-density mammographic patterns.
CONCLUSIONS: Chest circumference as a measure of upper body fat adiposity appears to be a stronger determinant of mammographic patterns than body fat distribution (measured as WHR). A heavy body build in adulthood is associated with decreased mammographic density. Further studies are necessary to confirm our results, ideally prospective cohorts, looking at the effect of anthropometric determinants on mammographic pattern changes over time and breast cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18814046     DOI: 10.1007/s10552-008-9232-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  5 in total

1.  Distribution of mammographic density and its influential factors among Chinese women.

Authors:  Hongji Dai; Ye Yan; Peishan Wang; Peifang Liu; Yali Cao; Li Xiong; Yahong Luo; Tie Pan; Xiangjun Ma; Jie Wang; Zhenhua Yang; Xueou Liu; Chuan Chen; Yubei Huang; Yi Li; Yaogang Wang; Xishan Hao; Zhaoxiang Ye; Kexin Chen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Adult weight gain, fat distribution and mammographic density in Spanish pre- and post-menopausal women (DDM-Spain).

Authors:  Marina Pollán; Virginia Lope; Josefa Miranda-García; Milagros García; Francisco Casanova; Carmen Sánchez-Contador; Carmen Santamariña; Pilar Moreo; Carmen Vidal; Mercé Peris; María Pilar Moreno; José Antonio Vázquez-Carrete; Francisca Collado; Carmen Pedraz-Pingarrón; Nieves Ascunce; Dolores Salas-Trejo; Nuria Aragonés; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Francisco Ruiz-Perales
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Body size throughout the life course and mammographic density in Mexican women.

Authors:  Megan S Rice; Kimberly A Bertrand; Martin Lajous; Rulla M Tamimi; Gabriela Torres-Mejía; Carine Biessy; Ruy López-Ridaura; Isabelle Romieu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.624

4.  Association of mammographic breast density with dairy product consumption, sun exposure, and daily activity.

Authors:  Sadaf Alipour; Azin Saberi; Afsaneh Alikhassi; Leila Bayani; Ladan Hosseini
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2014-03-04

5.  Breast density in polycystic ovarian syndrome patients: A case-control study.

Authors:  Bita Eslami; Sadaf Alipour; Reihaneh Hosseini; Bentolhoda Fattah; Ashraf Moini
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2019-09-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.