Literature DB >> 18814007

Laparoscopic versus open liver segmentectomy: prospective, case-matched, intention-to-treat analysis of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness.

Francesco M Polignano1, Aaron J Quyn, Rodrigo S M de Figueiredo, Nikola A Henderson, Christoph Kulli, Iain S Tait.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Reduction in hospital stay, blood loss, postoperative pain and complications are common findings after laparoscopic liver resection, suggesting that the laparoscopic approach may be a suitable alternative to open surgery. Some concerns have been raised regarding cost effectiveness of this procedure and potential implications of its large-scale application. Our aim has been to determine cost effectiveness of laparoscopic liver surgery by a case-matched, case-control, intention-to-treat analysis of its costs and short-term clinical outcomes compared with open surgery.
METHODS: Laparoscopic liver segmentectomies and bisegmentectomies performed at Ninewells Hospital and Medical School between 2005 and 2007 were considered. Resections involving more than two Couinaud segments, or involving any synchronous procedure, were excluded. An operation-magnitude-matched control group was identified amongst open liver resections performed between 2004 and 2007. Hospital costs were obtained from the Scottish Health Service Costs Book (ISD Scotland) and average national costs were calculated. Cost of theatre time, disposable surgical devices, hospital stay, and high-dependency unit (HDU) and intensive care unit (ICU) usage were the main endpoints for comparison. Secondary endpoints were morbidity and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed with Student's t-test, chi(2) and Fisher exact test as most appropriate.
RESULTS: Twenty-five laparoscopic liver resections were considered, including atypical resection, segmentectomy and bisegmentectomy, and they were compared to 25 matching open resections. The two groups were homogeneous by age, sex, coexistent morbidity, magnitude of resection, prevalence of liver cirrhosis and indications. Operative time (p < 0.03), blood loss (p < 0.0001), Pringle manoeuvre (p < 0.03), hospital stay (p < 0.003) and postoperative complications (p < 0.002) were significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group. Overall hospital cost was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group by an average of 2,571 pounds sterling (p < 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic liver segmentectomy and bisegmentectomy are feasible, safe and cost effective compared to similar open resections. Large-scale application of laparoscopic liver surgery could translate into significant savings to hospitals and health care programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18814007     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0110-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  36 in total

1.  Laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Joseph F Buell; Alan J Koffron; Mark J Thomas; Steven Rudich; Michael Abecassis; E Steve Woodle
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  P M King; J M Blazeby; P Ewings; P J Franks; R J Longman; A H Kendrick; R M Kipling; R H Kennedy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Guidelines for conducting economic outcomes studies for endoscopic procedures.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; E Ferreira; P Goh; Y Idezuki; G Maddern; G Marks; G Stiegmann; B Taylor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic liver resection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hironori Kaneko; Sumito Takagi; Yuichiro Otsuka; Masaru Tsuchiya; Akira Tamura; Toshio Katagiri; Tetsuya Maeda; Tadaaki Shiba
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Matteo Frasson; Andrea Vignali; Walter Zuliani; Giovanni Capretti; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences.

Authors:  Anthony J Senagore; Hans J Duepree; Conor P Delaney; Sharmilla Dissanaike; Karen M Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more.

Authors:  Alan J Koffron; Greg Auffenberg; Robert Kung; Michael Abecassis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  An initial experience and evolution of laparoscopic hepatic resectional surgery.

Authors:  Joseph F Buell; Mark J Thomas; Travis C Doty; Keith S Gersin; Todd D Merchen; Manish Gupta; Steven M Rudich; E Steve Woodle
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  The value of laparoscopic liver surgery for solid benign hepatic tumors.

Authors:  Roberto Troisi; Roberto Montalti; Peter Smeets; Jacques Van Huysse; Hans Van Vlierberghe; Isabelle Colle; Steven De Gendt; Bernard de Hemptinne
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis: short- and middle-term results.

Authors:  G Belli; C Fantini; A D'Agostino; L Cioffi; S Langella; N Russolillo; A Belli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  69 in total

1.  Equivalent outcomes after anatomical and non-anatomical resection of small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with preserved liver function.

Authors:  Yoshito Tomimaru; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Shigeru Marubashi; Hiroshi Wada; Shogo Kobayashi; Masahiro Tanemura; Koji Umeshita; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori; Hiroaki Nagano
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic transdiaphragmatic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jordan M Cloyd; Brendan C Visser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  [Value of laparoscopic liver resection].

Authors:  M R Schön
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  National trends with a laparoscopic liver resection: results from a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Jin He; Neda Amini; Gaya Spolverato; Kenzo Hirose; Martin Makary; Christopher L Wolfgang; Matthew J Weiss; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Laparoscopic major hepatectomies: clinical outcomes and classification.

Authors:  Francesco Di Fabio; Morsal Samim; Paolo Di Gioia; Rosemary Godeseth; Neil W Pearce; Mohammed Abu Hilal
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Srinevas K Reddy; Allan Tsung; David A Geller
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Cost-Effective Surgical Management of Liver Disease Amidst a Financial Crisis.

Authors:  Nikolaos Arkadopoulos; Georgios Gemenetzis; Nikolaos Danias; Panagiotis Kokoropoulos; Ioanna Koukopoulou; Christos Bartsokas; Georgia Kostopanagiotou; Vassilios Smyrniotis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  A Comparison of Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery for Hepatic and Pancreatic Resections Among the Medicare Population.

Authors:  Qinyu Chen; Katiuscha Merath; Fabio Bagante; Ozgur Akgul; Mary Dillhoff; Jordan Cloyd; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Laparoscopic surgery of liver tumors.

Authors:  Johanna Kirchberg; Christoph Reißfelder; Jürgen Weitz; Moritz Koch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Oncological and surgical results of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for HCC less than 5 cm: case-matched analysis.

Authors:  Sam-Youl Yoon; Ki-Hun Kim; Dong-Hwan Jung; Ami Yu; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.