Literature DB >> 18814005

Two-stage laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch as treatment of high-risk super-obese patients: analysis of complications.

G Silecchia1, M Rizzello, G Casella, M Fioriti, E Soricelli, N Basso.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to retrospectively analyze the incidence of complications after two-stage laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (Lap BPD-DS) in high-risk super-obese patients and explore the possible predictive factors of specific complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG).
METHODS: High-risk patients--body mass index (BMI) > 50 kg/m(2) with at least two major comorbidities: type 2 diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), hypertension--undergoing two-stage laparoscopic BPD-DS were retrospectively analysed. The SG pouch volume was 100-150 ml; in the second stage, the common channel and the alimentary loop were 100 cm and 150 cm, respectively.
RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients (50 female, 57.5%) underwent SG (two open). The mean age was 41.8 +/- 10.22 years with BMI of 55.2 +/- 6.69 kg/m(2). Four patients had Prader-Willy syndrome. Fourteen (16.46%) patients (6 female, 42.8%) had postoperative complications such as bleeding, fistula, pulmonary embolism, transitory acute renal failure, and abdominal abscess. One patient died at postoperative day 5 of pulmonary embolism. One patient was reoperated for hemoperitoneum by laparoscopy. The risk of complications after SG was lower in patients where reinforcement of the suture line was used (0.492), while it was higher in men (1.780). Neither difference was statistically significant [p = not significant (NS)]. After 9-24 months, 27 patients (BMI 43 +/- 8 kg/m(2)) underwent a second stage of BPD-DS (two open). Major postoperative complications were registered in eight patients (29.6%): three bleeding, four duodeno-ileal stenosis and one rhabdomyolysis. Two cases of internal hernia required laparoscopic reoperation. The reoperation rate was 1/85 (1.2%) after SG and 2/27 (7.4%) after second stage.
CONCLUSIONS: Complications after SG greatly decrease after the learning curve period and can be successfully managed without need of reoperation. Suture-line reinforcement, at least selectively in the middle-upper portion of the staple line and in super-super-obese patients, is recommended to decrease the incidence of specific complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18814005     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0113-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch for morbid obesity: a feasibility study in pigs.

Authors:  J de Csepel; S Burpee; G Jossart; V Andrei; Y Murakami; S Benavides; M Gagner
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 2.  Sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric procedure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.734

Review 3.  Laparoscopic duodenal switch for morbid obesity.

Authors:  Michel Gagner; Camilo Boza
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Effectiveness of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (first stage of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch) on co-morbidities in super-obese high-risk patients.

Authors:  Gianfranco Silecchia; Cristian Boru; Alessandro Pecchia; Mario Rizzello; Giovanni Casella; Frida Leonetti; Nicola Basso
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for a super-super-obese patient with situs inversus totalis.

Authors:  Jean Marc Catheline; Caroline Rosales; Régis Cohen; Hélène Bihan; Jean Luc Fournier; Joël Roussel; Joseph Bénichou
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Decreased bleeding after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with or without duodenal switch for morbid obesity using a stapled buttressed absorbable polymer membrane.

Authors:  Esther C J Consten; Michel Gagner; Alfons Pomp; William B Inabnet
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Vertical gastrectomy for morbid obesity in 216 patients: report of two-year results.

Authors:  Crystine M Lee; Paul T Cirangle; Gregg H Jossart
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial bariatric operation for high-risk patients: initial results in 10 patients.

Authors:  Philippe Mognol; Denis Chosidow; Jean-Pierre Marmuse
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 9.  Sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity.

Authors:  Andrew A Gumbs; Michel Gagner; Gregory Dakin; Alfons Pomp
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Does gastric dilatation limit the success of sleeve gastrectomy as a sole operation for morbid obesity?

Authors:  Felix B Langer; Arthur Bohdjalian; Franz X Felberbauer; Edith Fleischmann; Mir A Reza Hoda; Bernhard Ludvik; Johannes Zacherl; Raimund Jakesz; Gerhard Prager
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.129

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does it have advantages? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yoon Young Choi; Jungmin Bae; Kyung Yul Hur; Dongho Choi; Yong Jin Kim
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: More than a restrictive bariatric surgery procedure?

Authors:  David Benaiges; Antonio Más-Lorenzo; Albert Goday; José M Ramon; Juan J Chillarón; Juan Pedro-Botet; Juana A Flores-Le Roux
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Nonsurgical treatment of staple line leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  G Casella; E Soricelli; M Rizzello; P Trentino; F Fiocca; A Fantini; F M Salvatori; N Basso
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Survey on laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at the Fourth International Consensus Summit on Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Michel Gagner; Mervyn Deitel; Ann L Erickson; Ross D Crosby
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 5.  Laparoscopic revolution in bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Magnus Sundbom
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Bridging interventions before bariatric surgery in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yung Lee; Jerry T Dang; Noah Switzer; Roshan Malhan; Daniel W Birch; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The impact of bariatric surgery on insulin-treated type 2 diabetes patients.

Authors:  Rodrigo Lemus; Dror Karni; Dennis Hong; Scott Gmora; Ruth Breau; Mehran Anvari
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Comparison of Rhabdomyolysis Markers in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery with Propofol and Inhalation-based Anesthesia.

Authors:  Amit Lehavi; Olga Sandler; Ahmad Mahajna; Abraham Weissman; Yeshayahu Shai Katz
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Clinical and Economic Evaluation of Absorbable Staple Line Buttressing in Sleeve Gastrectomy in High-Risk Patients.

Authors:  X Gayrel; M Loureiro; E M Skalli; C Dutot; G Mercier; D Nocca
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 10.  Acute complications after laparoscopic bariatric procedures: update for the general surgeon.

Authors:  Fabio Cesare Campanile; Cristian E Boru; Mario Rizzello; Alessandro Puzziello; Catalin Copaescu; Giuseppe Cavallaro; Gianfranco Silecchia
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.