OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) blockade on cell survival and on downstream signalling pathways using the monoclonal antibody cetuximab. METHODS: We used three colon cancer cell lines, of which one was EGFR-negative, and two head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) lines. EGFR expression and gene copy number were measured by immunohistochemistry and FISH analysis, respectively. The effect of cetuximab, irradiation or the combination of both on cell growth was estimated by SRB assay. Western blotting was used to determine the phosphorylation of intracellular signalling proteins and cell cycle phase distribution was measured by flow cytometry. RESULTS: The addition of cetuximab had only limited effects on cell growth, with a maximum inhibition of approximately 30%, but was correlated with the amount of protein expression and gene copy number of EGFR. When combined with irradiation, the effect of cetuximab was only additive and not dependent on the inherent radio-sensitivity of the cell lines. Persistent phosphorylation of Akt and/or p44/42 MAPK was detected by western blot in all of the cell lines, whereas there was no phosphorylation of Jak2 or STAT3. CONCLUSIONS: None of these factors alone could predict the sensitivity to cetuximab. Rather, the results suggest that it might be necessary to determine the activation status of several intracellular signalling proteins to better predict the sensitivity to cetuximab treatment.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) blockade on cell survival and on downstream signalling pathways using the monoclonal antibody cetuximab. METHODS: We used three colon cancer cell lines, of which one was EGFR-negative, and two head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) lines. EGFR expression and gene copy number were measured by immunohistochemistry and FISH analysis, respectively. The effect of cetuximab, irradiation or the combination of both on cell growth was estimated by SRB assay. Western blotting was used to determine the phosphorylation of intracellular signalling proteins and cell cycle phase distribution was measured by flow cytometry. RESULTS: The addition of cetuximab had only limited effects on cell growth, with a maximum inhibition of approximately 30%, but was correlated with the amount of protein expression and gene copy number of EGFR. When combined with irradiation, the effect of cetuximab was only additive and not dependent on the inherent radio-sensitivity of the cell lines. Persistent phosphorylation of Akt and/or p44/42 MAPK was detected by western blot in all of the cell lines, whereas there was no phosphorylation of Jak2 or STAT3. CONCLUSIONS: None of these factors alone could predict the sensitivity to cetuximab. Rather, the results suggest that it might be necessary to determine the activation status of several intracellular signalling proteins to better predict the sensitivity to cetuximab treatment.
Authors: Benjamin Barré; Arnaud Vigneron; Neil Perkins; Igor B Roninson; Erick Gamelin; Olivier Coqueret Journal: Trends Mol Med Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 11.951
Authors: Eva Henriksson; Bo Baldetorp; Ake Borg; Elisabeth Kjellen; Jan Akervall; Johan Wennerberg; Peter Wahlberg Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2006 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: Roy S Herbst; Matthew Arquette; Dong M Shin; Karel Dicke; Everett E Vokes; Nozar Azarnia; Waun Ki Hong; Merrill S Kies Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-07-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Incheol Shin; F Michael Yakes; Federico Rojo; Nah-Young Shin; Andrei V Bakin; Jose Baselga; Carlos L Arteaga Journal: Nat Med Date: 2002-09-16 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: P Skehan; R Storeng; D Scudiero; A Monks; J McMahon; D Vistica; J T Warren; H Bokesch; S Kenney; M R Boyd Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1990-07-04 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Bea Pauwels; Annelies E C Korst; Christel M J de Pooter; Greet G O Pattyn; Hilde A J Lambrechts; Marc F D Baay; Filip Lardon; Jan B Vermorken Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2003-01-22 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Goro Oshima; Johan Wennerberg; Takashi Yamatodani; Elisabeth Kjellén; Hiroyuki Mineta; Anders Johnsson; Lars Ekblad Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2011-12-23 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: J Hun Hah; Mei Zhao; Curtis R Pickering; Mitchell J Frederick; Genevieve A Andrews; Samar A Jasser; David R Fooshee; Zvonimir L Milas; Chad Galer; Daisuke Sano; William N William; Edward Kim; John Heymach; Lauren A Byers; Vali Papadimitrakopoulou; Jeffrey N Myers Journal: Head Neck Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Thomas W Grunt; Alexandra Hebar; Sylvia Laffer; Renate Wagner; Barbara Peter; Harald Herrmann; Alexandra Graf; Martin Bilban; Martin Posch; Gregor Hoermann; Matthias Mayerhofer; Gregor Eisenwort; Christoph C Zielinski; Edgar Selzer; Peter Valent Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2015-01-15 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Malabika Sen; Sonali Joyce; Mary Panahandeh; Changyou Li; Sufi M Thomas; Jessica Maxwell; Lin Wang; William E Gooding; Daniel E Johnson; Jennifer R Grandis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-07-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ivy F L Tsui; Catherine F Poh; Cathie Garnis; Miriam P Rosin; Lewei Zhang; Wan L Lam Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2009-11-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: N Miyoshi; H Ishii; K Mimori; Y Takatsuno; H Kim; H Hirose; M Sekimoto; Y Doki; M Mori Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 7.640