BACKGROUND: Although serum measures of micronutrients are more specific than questionnaires in quantifying nutritional status, the reliability of serum measures depends on between- and within-person variability of circulating micronutrient levels. The extent to which multiple samples per person might improve reliability is useful information for planning studies and interpreting results. METHODS: We analyzed levels of 25 micronutrients in serum samples taken from 381 Hawaii women at 4-month intervals. For all subjects and for subjects at the low and high end of the micronutrient distributions, we calculated inter- and intraindividual variability, reliability coefficients, and the number of measurements required to limit attenuation in estimated parameters (ie, to keep estimates close to their true values). RESULTS: For 18 of the 25 micronutrients, a single measurement provided an estimate within 20% of the true value. For regression coefficients, 2 measurements were needed to limit attenuation to no more than 20% for nearly half of the micronutrients. To achieve no more than 10% attenuation, the number of measurements required ranged from 2 to 10 for correlation and from 3 to 20 for regression coefficients. To achieve no more than 5% attenuation, the corresponding ranges were 3 to 21 for correlation and 6 to 42 regression coefficients. In general, more measurements were required for adequate characterization of subjects with relatively high levels of micronutrients than for subjects with lower levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that 2 or 3 blood measurements are enough to limit attenuation of regression coefficients within 20% of the true value for most carotenoids and tocopherols. For 10% attenuation or less, 4 or more micronutrient measurements may be needed.
BACKGROUND: Although serum measures of micronutrients are more specific than questionnaires in quantifying nutritional status, the reliability of serum measures depends on between- and within-person variability of circulating micronutrient levels. The extent to which multiple samples per person might improve reliability is useful information for planning studies and interpreting results. METHODS: We analyzed levels of 25 micronutrients in serum samples taken from 381 Hawaii women at 4-month intervals. For all subjects and for subjects at the low and high end of the micronutrient distributions, we calculated inter- and intraindividual variability, reliability coefficients, and the number of measurements required to limit attenuation in estimated parameters (ie, to keep estimates close to their true values). RESULTS: For 18 of the 25 micronutrients, a single measurement provided an estimate within 20% of the true value. For regression coefficients, 2 measurements were needed to limit attenuation to no more than 20% for nearly half of the micronutrients. To achieve no more than 10% attenuation, the number of measurements required ranged from 2 to 10 for correlation and from 3 to 20 for regression coefficients. To achieve no more than 5% attenuation, the corresponding ranges were 3 to 21 for correlation and 6 to 42 regression coefficients. In general, more measurements were required for adequate characterization of subjects with relatively high levels of micronutrients than for subjects with lower levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that 2 or 3 blood measurements are enough to limit attenuation of regression coefficients within 20% of the true value for most carotenoids and tocopherols. For 10% attenuation or less, 4 or more micronutrient measurements may be needed.
Authors: G S Omenn; G E Goodman; M D Thornquist; J Balmes; M R Cullen; A Glass; J P Keogh; F L Meyskens; B Valanis; J H Williams; S Barnhart; M G Cherniack; C A Brodkin; S Hammar Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1996-11-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: D Albanes; O P Heinonen; P R Taylor; J Virtamo; B K Edwards; M Rautalahti; A M Hartman; J Palmgren; L S Freedman; J Haapakoski; M J Barrett; P Pietinen; N Malila; E Tala; K Liippo; E R Salomaa; J A Tangrea; L Teppo; F B Askin; E Taskinen; Y Erozan; P Greenwald; J K Huttunen Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1996-11-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: R V Cooney; A A Franke; J H Hankin; L J Custer; L R Wilkens; P J Harwood; L Le Marchand Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 1995 Apr-May Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Jacqueline M Major; Barry I Graubard; Kevin W Dodd; Allison Iwan; Bruce H Alexander; Martha S Linet; D Michal Freedman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Gene L Bowman; Jackilen Shannon; Emily Ho; Maret G Traber; Balz Frei; Barry S Oken; Jeffery A Kaye; Joseph F Quinn Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2011 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Yurii B Shvetsov; Brenda Y Hernandez; Lynne R Wilkens; Pamela J Thompson; Adrian A Franke; Xuemei Zhu; Marc T Goodman Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Gary E Fraser; Karen Jaceldo-Siegl; Susanne M Henning; Jing Fan; Synnove F Knutsen; Ella H Haddad; Joan Sabaté; W Lawrence Beeson; Hannelore Bennett Journal: J Nutr Date: 2016-02-03 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Megan E Romano; Daniel A Enquobahrie; Christopher D Simpson; Harvey Checkoway; Michelle A Williams Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Torsten Bohn; Charles Desmarchelier; Lars O Dragsted; Charlotte S Nielsen; Wilhelm Stahl; Ralph Rühl; Jaap Keijer; Patrick Borel Journal: Mol Nutr Food Res Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 5.914