Literature DB >> 18812854

Global age-dependent differences in gene expression in response to calvarial injury.

Derrick C Wan1, Matthew D Kwan, Deepak M Gupta, Zhen Wang, Bethany J Slater, Nicholas J Panetta, Nathan T Morrell, Michael T Longaker.   

Abstract

Children less than 2 years of age are capable of healing large calvarial defects, whereas adults have been found to lack this endogenous ability. In this study, we used microarray analysis to compare genomewide expression patterns during active regeneration after injury with calvaria in skeletally immature and mature mice. Parietal bone defects were created in 6-day-old (juvenile) and 60-day-old (adult) mice using a 4-mm trephine bit (n = 20 mice per age group). The calvarial disc was removed, leaving the underlying dura mater intact. Two weeks after injury, the region of regeneration with the underlying dura mater was harvested, and RNA was extracted for microarray analysis. The 25 most differentially upregulated genes in juvenile regenerates compared with adults were listed, as well as selected bone-related genes. In addition, QRT-PCR confirmation of specific genes was performed for validation. Juvenile regenerates expressed significantly greater amounts of BMP-2, -4, -7, as well as FGF-2 and its receptor FGFR-1. Various other growth factors were also noted to be upregulated, including IGF-2 and Ptn. This corresponded with the increased expression of markers for osteogenic differentiation of Sparc and Oc. Markers of osteoclast activity, Acp5, Ctsk, and Mmp2, were noted to be greater in juvenile regenerates compared with adults. The observation of Mmp14 upregulation, however, highlights the importance of balanced osteoclast-mediated bone resorption for ultimate healing. The 2 most differentially regulated genes, transthyretin (Ttr) and prostaglandin D2 synthase (Ptgds), highlight the potential role of retinoic acid signaling and the prostaglandin axis on skeletal regeneration. These findings underscore the multitude of biomolecular mechanisms at play, allowing juvenile calvaria to heal after injury. The identification of various growth factors and cytokines involved also suggests novel therapeutic strategies for tissue-engineering purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18812854     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181843609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  8 in total

1.  Dura mater stimulates human adipose-derived stromal cells to undergo bone formation in mouse calvarial defects.

Authors:  Benjamin Levi; Emily R Nelson; Shuli Li; Aaron W James; Jeong S Hyun; Daniel T Montoro; Min Lee; Jason P Glotzbach; George W Commons; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 2.  Molecular genetic studies of gene identification for osteoporosis: the 2009 update.

Authors:  Xiang-Hong Xu; Shan-Shan Dong; Yan Guo; Tie-Lin Yang; Shu-Feng Lei; Christopher J Papasian; Ming Zhao; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 3.  Stem cell paracrine actions and tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Priya R Baraniak; Todd C McDevitt
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 4.  * Calvarial Defects: Cell-Based Reconstructive Strategies in the Murine Model.

Authors:  Matthew P Murphy; Natalina Quarto; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.273

5.  Enhanced Activation of Canonical Wnt Signaling Confers Mesoderm-Derived Parietal Bone with Similar Osteogenic and Skeletal Healing Capacity to Neural Crest-Derived Frontal Bone.

Authors:  Shuli Li; Natalina Quarto; Kshemendra Senarath-Yapa; Nathaniel Grey; Xue Bai; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Regenerative strategies for craniofacial disorders.

Authors:  Catharine B Garland; Jason H Pomerantz
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Delayed effect of craniotomy on experimental seizures in rats.

Authors:  Patrick A Forcelli; David Kalikhman; Karen Gale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Endogenous Mechanisms of Craniomaxillofacial Repair: Toward Novel Regenerative Therapies.

Authors:  Heather E desJardins-Park; Shamik Mascharak; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  Front Oral Health       Date:  2021-05-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.