Literature DB >> 18812585

Modifying ICD-9-CM coding of secondary diagnoses to improve risk-adjustment of inpatient mortality rates.

Michael Pine1, Harmon S Jordan, Anne Elixhauser, Donald E Fry, David C Hoaglin, Barbara Jones, Roger Meimban, David Warner, Junius Gonzales.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect on risk-adjustment of inpatient mortality rates of progressively enhancing administrative claims data with clinical data that are increasingly expensive to obtain. Data Sources. Claims and abstracted clinical data on patients hospitalized for 5 medical conditions and 3 surgical procedures at 188 Pennsylvania hospitals from July 2000 through June 2003.
METHODS: Risk-adjustment models for inpatient mortality were derived using claims data with secondary diagnoses limited to conditions unlikely to be hospital-acquired complications. Models were enhanced with one or more of 1) secondary diagnoses inferred from clinical data to have been present-on-admission (POA), 2) secondary diagnoses not coded on claims but documented in medical records as POA, 3) numerical laboratory results from the first hospital day, and 4) all available clinical data from the first hospital day. Alternative models were compared using c-statistics, the magnitude of errors in prediction for individual cases, and the percentage of hospitals with aggregate errors in prediction exceeding specified thresholds.
RESULTS: More complete coding of a few under-reported secondary diagnoses and adding numerical laboratory results to claims data substantially improved predictions of inpatient mortality. Little improvement resulted from increasing the maximum number of available secondary diagnoses or adding additional clinical data.
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the completeness and consistency of reporting a few secondary diagnosis codes for findings POA and merging claims data with numerical laboratory values improved risk adjustment of inpatient mortality rates. Expensive abstraction of additional clinical information from medical records resulted in little further improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18812585     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X08323297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  7 in total

1.  Development and validation of a disease-specific risk adjustment system using automated clinical data.

Authors:  Ying P Tabak; Xiaowu Sun; Karen G Derby; Stephen G Kurtz; Richard S Johannes
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The impact of the present on admission indicator on the accuracy of administrative data for carotid endarterectomy and stenting.

Authors:  Margriet Fokkema; Rob Hurks; Thomas Curran; Rodney P Bensley; Allen D Hamdan; Mark C Wyers; Frans L Moll; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Exploration of ICD-9-CM coding of chronic disease within the Elixhauser Comorbidity Measure in patients with chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Jennifer Hornung Garvin; Andrew Redd; Dan Bolton; Pauline Graham; Dominic Roche; Peter Groeneveld; Molly Leecaster; Shuying Shen; Mark G Weiner
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2013-10-01

4.  Screening entire healthcare system ECG database: Association of deep terminal negativity of P wave in lead V1 and ECG referral with mortality.

Authors:  Allison Junell; Jason Thomas; Lauren Hawkins; Jiri Sklenar; Trevor Feldman; Charles A Henrikson; Larisa G Tereshchenko
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Geographic variation in diagnosis frequency and risk of death among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; Sandra M Sharp; Dan J Gottlieb; Jonathan S Skinner; John E Wennberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Comparison of Rx-defined morbidity groups and diagnosis- based risk adjusters for predicting healthcare costs in Taiwan.

Authors:  Raymond Nc Kuo; Mei-Shu Lai
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Using highly detailed administrative data to predict pneumonia mortality.

Authors:  Michael B Rothberg; Penelope S Pekow; Aruna Priya; Marya D Zilberberg; Raquel Belforti; Daniel Skiest; Tara Lagu; Thomas L Higgins; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.