Literature DB >> 18812485

Prospective study of high-dose cabergoline treatment of prolactinomas in 150 patients.

Masami Ono1, Nobuhiro Miki, Takakazu Kawamata, Rena Makino, Kosaku Amano, Toshiro Seki, Osami Kubo, Tomokatsu Hori, Kazue Takano.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Cabergoline fails to normalize hyperprolactinemia in a considerable proportion of prolactinomas, especially macroadenomas.
OBJECTIVE: We examined the effect of individualized high-dose cabergoline treatment on hyperprolactinemia in prolactinomas. PATIENTS: The study included 122 women and 28 men (93 microadenomas and 57 macroadenomas). Forty-seven had undergone transsphenoidal surgery. According to the preceding medical treatment, the participants were separated into untreated (group U; n = 60), intolerant (group I; n = 64), and resistant (group R; n = 26) groups.
INTERVENTIONS: We promptly increased cabergoline dose on the basis of individual prolactin levels. Length of treatment was 1 yr.
RESULTS: Cabergoline normalized hyperprolactinemia in all patients except one. The proportion of prolactin normalization in both groups U and I was 83% at 3 months and 95% at 6 months. By contrast, that in group R was 35% at 3 months and 58% at 6 months. Mean cabergoline dose in milligrams per week at the time of prolactin normalization was 2.0 +/- 0.3 in group U, 0.9 +/- 0.1 in group I, and 5.2 +/- 0.6 in group R. Prolactin normalization rate at the 3 mg/wk dose was 84% overall but only 35% in group R. Serum progesterone or testosterone levels, diminished in 122 women or 16 men, respectively, were recovered in all except one resistant and four postmenopausal or panhypopituitary patients.
CONCLUSION: Individualized high-dose cabergoline treatment can normalize hyperprolactinemia and hypogonadism in nearly all prolactinomas irrespective of tumor size or preceding treatments. Hyperprolactinemia could be controlled in poor responders within 1 yr with doses higher than 3 mg/wk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18812485     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2007-2758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  47 in total

1.  Effect of dopaminergic drug treatment on surgical findings in prolactinomas.

Authors:  Maria Menucci; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; Peter Burger; Roberto Salvatori
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 2.  Medical treatment of prolactinomas.

Authors:  Annamaria Colao; Silvia Savastano
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  Pituitary tumors: cabergoline versus bromocriptine: a meta-analysis?

Authors:  Mark E Molitch
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 4.  Medically induced CSF rhinorrhea following treatment of macroprolactinoma: case series and literature review.

Authors:  Tomáš Česák; Pavel Poczos; Jaroslav Adamkov; Jiří Náhlovský; Petra Kašparová; Filip Gabalec; Petr Čelakovský; Ondrej Choutka
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 5.  Prolactinoma through the female life cycle.

Authors:  Deirdre Cocks Eschler; Pedram Javanmard; Katherine Cox; Eliza B Geer
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Pediatric prolactinoma: initial presentation, treatment, and long-term prognosis.

Authors:  Anika Hoffmann; Sarah Adelmann; Kristin Lohle; Alexander Claviez; Hermann L Müller
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  Surgical treatment of prolactinomas: cons.

Authors:  Eve Bloomgarden; Mark E Molitch
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 8.  Management of aggressive pituitary adenomas and pituitary carcinomas.

Authors:  Anthony Heaney
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  10-year follow-up study comparing primary medical vs. surgical therapy in women with prolactinomas.

Authors:  Lukas Andereggen; Janine Frey; Robert H Andres; Marwan El-Koussy; Jürgen Beck; Rolf W Seiler; Emanuel Christ
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.633

10.  Giant prolactinomas: are they really different from ordinary macroprolactinomas?

Authors:  Etual Espinosa; Ernesto Sosa; Victoria Mendoza; Claudia Ramírez; Virgilio Melgar; Moisés Mercado
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.