Literature DB >> 18812278

The impact of proximal femur geometry on fracture type--a comparison between cervical and trochanteric fractures with two parameters.

J Panula1, M Sävelä, P T Jaatinen, P Aarnio, S-L Kivelä.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Only a few studies have tested the ability of proximal femur geometry parameters to discriminate between cervical hip fractures and those of the trochanter. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the geometrical differences between these two fracture types by measuring the neck shaft angle (NSA) and the femoral neck axis length (FNAL). We also compared the distributions of these parameters and the distributions of fracture type by gender.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was made in a population-based material of 428 hip fractures collected during a two-year period from 1999 to 2000 (323 women and 105 men aged 65 years or older). NSA and FNAL were manually measured from pelvic radiographs.
RESULTS: No significant differences in NSA or FNAL were found between cervical and trochanteric hip fractures in women or in men. Men had significantly higher NSA and FNAL than women. Age was not related to these geometrical parameters. The distributions by fracture type were similar in both genders.
CONCLUSIONS: The different pathogenesis of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures cannot be explained by NSA or FNAL. A standardized measurement setup is needed when evaluating the role of hip geometry in fracture patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18812278     DOI: 10.1177/145749690809700311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Surg        ISSN: 1457-4969            Impact factor:   2.360


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of femoral morphology and bone mineral density between femoral neck fractures and trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Yuki Maeda; Nobuhiko Sugano; Masanobu Saito; Kazuo Yonenobu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Influence of bone mineral density and hip geometry on the different types of hip fracture.

Authors:  Yizhong Li; Jinkuang Lin; Siqing Cai; Lisheng Yan; Yuancheng Pan; Xuedong Yao; Huafeng Zhuang; Peiwen Wang; Yanjun Zeng
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 3.363

3.  Femoral neck shaft angle in men with fragility fractures.

Authors:  S P Tuck; D J Rawlings; A C Scane; I Pande; G D Summers; A D Woolf; R M Francis
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2011-10-13

4.  Urban versus rural differences in the occurrence of hip fractures in Japan's Kyoto prefecture during 2008-2010: a comparison of femoral neck and trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Motoyuki Horii; Hiroyoshi Fujiwara; Takumi Ikeda; Keiichiro Ueshima; Kazuya Ikoma; Toshiharu Shirai; Ryu Terauchi; Masateru Nagae; Nagato Kuriyama; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Proximal Femoral Geometry as Fracture Risk Factor in Female Patients with Osteoporotic Hip Fracture.

Authors:  Jun Han; Myung Hoon Hahn
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2016-08-31

6.  Cortical thickness in the intertrochanteric region may be relevant to hip fracture type.

Authors:  Huafeng Zhuang; Yizhong Li; Jinkuang Lin; Donglu Cai; Siqing Cai; Lisheng Yan; Xuedong Yao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.