Literature DB >> 18812215

Evaluation of ethyl acetate on three dimensions: investigation of behavioral, physiological and psychological indicators of adverse chemosensory effects.

Stefan Kleinbeck1, Stephanie A Juran, Ernst Kiesswetter, Michael Schäper, Meinolf Blaszkewicz, Thomas Brüning, Christoph van Thriel.   

Abstract

A variety of national occupational exposure limits for ethyl acetate exist based on different studies, mostly relying on subjective evaluations of ethyl acetate as an irritant. Only one study also used physiological methods with inconsistent results in subjective and objective data. The present study was designed to investigate ethyl acetate on three different dimensions: behavioral, physiological and psychological indicators of adverse chemosensory effects were investigated during acute exposures to different concentrations of ethyl acetate. Twenty-four subjects were challenged with ethyl acetate in three exposure patterns (2 ppm, 400 ppm, 400 ppm including peaks of 800 ppm). While the odor intensity is rated "strong", trigeminal perceptions were rated less than "moderate". The absence of substantial trigeminal ratings was supported by physiological data. There was neither an effect of concentration on blinking frequency nor on nasal resistance which both are indicators of irritation. Furthermore, there are no effects of ethyl acetate concentration on behavioral measures indicating no olfactory or trigeminally mediated disturbance of cognitive processing. In conclusion, the results of this multilevel approach revealed no adverse chemosensory effects at ethyl acetate concentrations as recommended by the German MAK-value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18812215     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  4 in total

1.  Exposure study to examine chemosensory effects of formaldehyde on hyposensitive and hypersensitive males.

Authors:  Joerg U Mueller; Thomas Bruckner; Gerhard Triebig
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  Sensory irritation as a basis for setting occupational exposure limits.

Authors:  Thomas Brüning; Rüdiger Bartsch; Hermann Maximillian Bolt; Herbert Desel; Hans Drexler; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Andrea Hartwig; Rudolf Jäckh; Edgar Leibold; Dirk Pallapies; Albert W Rettenmeier; Gerhard Schlüter; Gisela Stropp; Kirsten Sucker; Gerhard Triebig; Götz Westphal; Christoph van Thriel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Odor thresholds and breathing changes of human volunteers as consequences of sulphur dioxide exposure considering individual factors.

Authors:  Stefan Kleinbeck; Michael Schäper; Stephanie A Juran; Ernst Kiesswetter; Meinolf Blaszkewicz; Klaus Golka; Anna Zimmermann; Thomas Brüning; Christoph Van Thriel
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2011-12-05

4.  A short-term inhalation study to assess the reversibility of sensory irritation in human volunteers.

Authors:  Stefan Kleinbeck; Michael Schäper; Marlene Pacharra; Marie Louise Lehmann; Klaus Golka; Meinolf Blaszkewicz; Thomas Brüning; Christoph van Thriel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 5.153

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.