Literature DB >> 18812117

Interim results of a compassionate-use clinical trial of Morcher iris diaphragm implantation: report 1.

Michael D Olson1, Samuel Masket, Kevin M Miller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of several different Morcher iris diaphragms in the treatment of partial or complete aniridia.
SETTING: Jules Stein Eye Institute and the Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
METHODS: This ongoing prospective single-site nonrandomized interventional clinical trial was designed to evaluate Morcher iris diaphragm models 50D, 50F, 96S, and 96F. Safety measures included changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), surgical complications, adverse events, and postoperative interventions. Efficacy measures included changes in best corrected glare visual acuity and changes in daytime and nighttime glare sensitivity, measured by questionnaire responses.
RESULTS: Thirteen patients (13 eyes) completed a 1-year follow-up. Regarding safety, there was a statistically significant improvement in median BCVA of 2 Snellen lines (P= .002). One patient lost 2 letters of BCVA on the 20/20 line. There were 2 adverse events. One was minor bleeding during a posterior synechialysis that resolved without intervention. The second was piggyback intraocular lens decentration from worsening zonular dialysis in an eye with a trauma history. One postoperative intervention was the repositioning of a 50D ring. Regarding efficacy, there was a statistically significant median improvement in best corrected glare acuity of 10 Snellen lines (P<or=.001). Subjective daytime glare improved 5 questionnaire scale points (P= .004), and nighttime glare sensitivity improved 3 scale points (P= .001).
CONCLUSION: Morcher iris diaphragms were relatively safe and very effective in reducing the light and glare sensitivity associated with partial or complete aniridia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18812117     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.05.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Prosthetic iris devices].

Authors:  J Wolff
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Simultaneous correction of post-traumatic aphakia and aniridia with the use of artificial iris and IOL implantation.

Authors:  Cesare Forlini; Matteo Forlini; Robert Rejdak; Agata Prokopiuk; Oxana Levkina; Adriana Bratu; Paolo Rossini; Perfecto R Cagampang; Gian Maria Cavallini
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Clinical and molecular aspects of congenital aniridia - A review of current concepts.

Authors:  Shailja Tibrewal; Ria Ratna; Abha Gour; Sumita Agarkar; Suneeta Dubey; Suma Ganesh; Ramesh Kekunnaya; Virender Sangwan; Yutao Liu; Vanita Vanita
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.969

4.  Engineering a Light-Attenuating Artificial Iris.

Authors:  Farah J Shareef; Shan Sun; Mrignayani Kotecha; Iris Kassem; Dimitri Azar; Michael Cho
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Combined cataract phacoemulsification and aniridia endocapsular rings implantation in a patient with bilateral congenital aniridia and cataract: A case report.

Authors:  Roberto Gonzalez-Salinas; Fabiola Pena-Guani
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-30

6.  Lessons Learned from Implantation of Morcher 50D and 96S Artificial Iris Diaphragms.

Authors:  Shawn R Lin; Kevin M Miller
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-23

7.  Implantation of a small-aperture intraocular lens and a partial aniridia implant in eyes with traumatic iris defects.

Authors:  Hyeck-Soo Son; Timur Yildirim; Ramin Khoramnia; Grzegorz Labuz; Christian Mayer; Gerd U Auffarth
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2020-03-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.