SETTING: Extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB), including mycobacteriosis, contributes 15-20% of all tuberculosis (TB) cases. The diagnosis of EPTB remains elusive because of the inadequate sensitivity of routine and conventional bacteriological methods for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and related organisms in clinical specimens such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), pleural fluid and peritoneal fluid. OBJECTIVE: To develop a better diagnostic marker for EPTB. DESIGN: In our study, 179 cases of EPTB were analysed for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear, adenosine deaminase activity (ADA) and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Although estimation of ADA is helpful, its sensitivity and specificity varies widely. On the other hand, a multiplex PCR using amplicons such as IS6110, dnaJ gene and hsp65 genes has high sensitivity (60-88%) and specificity (81-100%). RESULTS: On comparing AFB and ADA results with PCR, the PCR is clearly more effective than AFB (P < 0.001) and ADA estimation (P < 0.02) in CSF. The same result was observed with peritoneal fluid (P < 0.001 vs. P < 0.05) and pleural fluid (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The study shows that multiplex PCR remains the best tool and is a much better marker for diagnosing EPTB.
SETTING:Extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB), including mycobacteriosis, contributes 15-20% of all tuberculosis (TB) cases. The diagnosis of EPTB remains elusive because of the inadequate sensitivity of routine and conventional bacteriological methods for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and related organisms in clinical specimens such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), pleural fluid and peritoneal fluid. OBJECTIVE: To develop a better diagnostic marker for EPTB. DESIGN: In our study, 179 cases of EPTB were analysed for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear, adenosine deaminase activity (ADA) and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Although estimation of ADA is helpful, its sensitivity and specificity varies widely. On the other hand, a multiplex PCR using amplicons such as IS6110, dnaJ gene and hsp65 genes has high sensitivity (60-88%) and specificity (81-100%). RESULTS: On comparing AFB and ADA results with PCR, the PCR is clearly more effective than AFB (P < 0.001) and ADA estimation (P < 0.02) in CSF. The same result was observed with peritoneal fluid (P < 0.001 vs. P < 0.05) and pleural fluid (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The study shows that multiplex PCR remains the best tool and is a much better marker for diagnosing EPTB.