Literature DB >> 1881163

Sociopolitical, economical and ethical issues in medicinal plant research.

E Elisabetsky1.   

Abstract

Medicinal plant research may be pursued with several goals: the understanding of a native medical system, the elucidation of the rational basis for the medicinal use of a certain plant species, the development of low cost phytotherapeutics, the discovery of prototypic drugs, and so on. More often than not, the research project starts with the collection of indigenous medical knowledge in various parts of the world and generates a dissertation, a scientific paper or a drug. Usually, indigenous knowledge was crucial to the development of such products; nevertheless, indigenous groups tend not to benefit from the achievements of research. Ethnopharmacology involves a series of sociopolitical, economic and ethical dilemmas, at various levels. Most research projects involve more than one country (e.g., field work in a remote part of an underdeveloped country). Frequently host country scientists, visiting scientists, and informants disagree about these dilemmas. As a result, such research efforts are perceived as scientific imperialism; scientists are accused of stealing plant materials and appropriating traditional plant knowledge for financial profit and/or professional advancement. Many governments, as well as indigenous societies are increasingly reluctant to permit such research. Increasingly, funding for field work utilizing indigenous informants is coming from industry. Historically neither native populations nor host countries have shared to a significant extent the financial benefits from any drug that reaches the market. Unless these issues are amply discussed and fairy resolved, medicinal plant research runs the risk of serving ethically questionable purposes.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1881163     DOI: 10.1016/0378-8741(91)90124-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol        ISSN: 0378-8741            Impact factor:   4.360


  3 in total

1.  The relevance of traditional knowledge systems for ethnopharmacological research: theoretical and methodological contributions.

Authors:  Victoria Reyes-García
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 2.733

2.  Gastroprotective mechanisms of the chloroform and ethyl acetate phases of Praxelis clematidea (Griseb.) R.M.King & H.Robinson (Asteraceae).

Authors:  Heloina de Sousa Falcão; Gabriela Lemos de Azevedo Maia; Flávia Bonamin; Hélio Kushima; Thiago Mello Moraes; Clélia Akiko Hiruma Lima; Christiane Takayama; Anderson Luiz Ferreira; Alba Regina Monteiro Souza Brito; Maria de Fátima Agra; José Maria Barbosa Filho; Leônia Maria Batista
Journal:  J Nat Med       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 2.343

Review 3.  The genus Caesalpinia L. (Caesalpiniaceae): phytochemical and pharmacological characteristics.

Authors:  João L Baldim Zanin; Bianca A de Carvalho; Paloma Salles Martineli; Marcelo Henrique dos Santos; João Henrique G Lago; Patrícia Sartorelli; Cláudio Viegas; Marisi G Soares
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.