Literature DB >> 18811363

Optimal foraging and beyond: how starlings cope with changes in food availability.

L M Bautista1, J Tinbergen, P Wiersma, A Kacelnik.   

Abstract

Foraging adaptations include behavioral and physiological responses, but most optimal foraging models deal exclusively with behavioral decision variables, taking other dimensions as constraints. To overcome this limitation, we measured behavioral and physiological responses of European starlings Sturnus vulgaris to changes in food availability in a laboratory environment. The birds lived in a closed economy with a choice of two foraging modes (flying and walking) and were observed under two treatments (hard and easy) that differed in the work required to obtain food. Comparing the hard with the easy treatment, we found the following differences. In the hard treatment, daily amount of work was higher, but daily intake was lower. Even though work was greater, total daily expenditure was smaller, partly because overnight metabolism was lower. Body mass was lower, but daily oscillation in body mass did not differ. Feces' caloric density was lower, indicating greater food utilization. Energy expenditure rate expressed as multiples of basal metabolic rate (BMR) increased during the working period from 3.5 x BMR (easy) to 5.2 x BMR (hard), but over the 24-h period, it was close to 2.4 x BMR in both treatments. We also found that rate of expenditure during flight was very high in both treatments (52.3 W in easy and 45.5 W in hard), as expected for short (as opposed to cruising) flights. The relative preferences between walking and flying were incompatible with maximizing the ratio of energy gains per unit of expenditure (efficiency) but compatible with maximizing net gain per unit of time during the foraging cycle (net rate). Neither currency explained the results when nonforaging time was included. Time was not a direct constraint: the birds rested more than 90% of the time in both treatments. Understanding this complex picture requires reasoning with ecological, physiological, and cognitive arguments. We defend the role of optimality as an appropriate tool to guide this integrative perspective.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 18811363     DOI: 10.1086/286189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  13 in total

1.  To walk or to fly? How birds choose among foraging modes.

Authors:  L M Bautista; J Tinbergen; A Kacelnik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Great ranging associated with greater reproductive investment in mammals.

Authors:  Herman Pontzer; Jason M Kamilar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The anterior cingulate gyrus signals the net value of others' rewards.

Authors:  Matthew A J Apps; Narender Ramnani
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Food supply and individual quality influence seabird energy expenditure and reproductive success.

Authors:  Shirel R Kahane-Rapport; Shannon Whelan; Justine Ammendolia; Scott A Hatch; Kyle H Elliott; Shoshanah Jacobs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The effect of learning on heart rate and behavior of European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  Laura W Glassman; Carl E Hagmann; Muhammad A Qadri; Robert G Cook; L Michael Romero
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol       Date:  2019-09-20

6.  Constrained Total Energy Expenditure and Metabolic Adaptation to Physical Activity in Adult Humans.

Authors:  Herman Pontzer; Ramon Durazo-Arvizu; Lara R Dugas; Jacob Plange-Rhule; Pascal Bovet; Terrence E Forrester; Estelle V Lambert; Richard S Cooper; Dale A Schoeller; Amy Luke
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Spatio-temporal variation in territory quality and oxidative status: a natural experiment in the Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis).

Authors:  Janske van de Crommenacker; Jan Komdeur; Terry Burke; David S Richardson
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Asymmetry in food handling behavior of a tree-dwelling rodent (Sciurus vulgaris).

Authors:  Nuria Polo-Cavia; Zoraida Vázquez; Francisco Javier de Miguel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Intermittent Food Absence Motivates Reallocation of Locomotion and Feeding in Spotted Munia (Lonchura punctulata).

Authors:  Amrita Srivastava; Shalie Malik; Garima Yadav; Sangeeta Rani
Journal:  J Circadian Rhythms       Date:  2015-06-08

10.  Foraging for high caloric anthropogenic prey is energetically costly.

Authors:  Susanne van Donk; Judy Shamoun-Baranes; Jaap van der Meer; Kees C J Camphuysen
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.