Literature DB >> 18811344

Pollinator behavior and deceptive pollination: learning process and floral evolution.

J B Ferdy1, P H Gouyon, J Moret, B Godelle.   

Abstract

Some species of flowering plants engage in nonmodel deceptive pollination, attracting pollinators by large nonmimetic floral displays and providing no reward. Pollinators can learn to avoid deceptive plants and to favor nectariferous species. The reproductive success of these species is expected to be density dependent for two opposite reasons: the commoner cheating flowers are, the easier they are to avoid and the lower the quality of the patch, making it more difficult to recognize that unrewarding flowers are not profitable. When a deceptive species is made up of multiple floral variants, pollinators' learning could decrease the reproductive success of any particularly common floral variant. Within a population of deceptive plants, mean reproductive success could, therefore, vary with the number of floral variants. We investigate these three hypotheses by modeling the behavior of pollinators foraging in communities of deceptive and rewarding flowers. Simulations revealed that the reproductive success of deceptive flowers varies in a density-dependent manner and that floral variants can be submitted to negative frequency-dependent selection. We compare density dependence in nonmodel deceptive species to what is expected in Batesian mimics and discuss possible selection of morphological variants. Finally, we survey how pollinators' learning capacities can make mean reproductive success depend on morphological variability within a population.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 18811344     DOI: 10.1086/286200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  14 in total

1.  Nectarless flowers: ecological correlates and evolutionary stability.

Authors:  Juilee D Thakar; Krushnamegh Kunte; Anisha K Chauhan; Aparna V Watve; Milind G Watve
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-06-28       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  How to cheat when you cannot lie? Deceit pollination in Begonia gracilis.

Authors:  Reyna A Castillo; Helga Caballero; Karina Boege; Juan Fornoni; César A Domínguez
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The co-optimization of floral display and nectar reward.

Authors:  Prajakta V Belsare; Balasubramanian Sriram; Milind G Watve
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Costs of deception and learned resistance in deceptive interactions.

Authors:  Marinus L de Jager; Allan G Ellis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sensory bias and signal detection trade-offs maintain intersexual floral mimicry.

Authors:  Avery L Russell; David W Kikuchi; Noah W Giebink; Daniel R Papaj
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  On the roles of colour and scent in a specialized floral mimicry system.

Authors:  Nicolas J Vereecken; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Phenology and phenotypic natural selection on the flowering time of a deceit-pollinated tropical orchid, Myrmecophila christinae.

Authors:  Victor Parra-Tabla; Carlos F Vargas
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Reproductive success of non-rewarding Cypripedium japonicum benefits from low spatial dispersion pattern and asynchronous flowering.

Authors:  Hai-Qin Sun; Jin Cheng; Fu-Min Zhang; Yi-Bo Luo; Song Ge
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Variability in floral scent in rewarding and deceptive orchids: the signature of pollinator-imposed selection?

Authors:  Charlotte C Salzmann; Antonio M Nardella; Salvatore Cozzolino; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Convergent evolution of floral signals underlies the success of Neotropical orchids.

Authors:  Alexander S T Papadopulos; Martyn P Powell; Franco Pupulin; Jorge Warner; Julie A Hawkins; Nicolas Salamin; Lars Chittka; Norris H Williams; W Mark Whitten; Deniz Loader; Luis M Valente; Mark W Chase; Vincent Savolainen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.