Literature DB >> 18811110

Association between ocular dominance and refraction.

Ilker Eser1, Daniel S Durrie, Frank Schwendeman, Jason E Stahl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between ocular dominance and refraction.
METHODS: A retrospective study of the cycloplegic refraction of 2453 consecutive patients with a mean age of 46 +/- 12 years (range: 18 to 79 years) was performed. One thousand one hundred fifty-seven (47%) patients were men and 1296 (53%) were women. Patients who had previous eye surgery, ocular disease, or > 2 lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) difference between eyes were excluded. Motor ocular dominance was determined using the hole-in-the-card test.
RESULTS: The right and left eyes were dominant in 67% (1650) and 33% (803) of patients, respectively. Males had a higher right eye dominance (70%) than females (65%) (P = .0168) with a mean cycloplegic spherical equivalent refracton (SE) of -2.12 diopters (D) and -2.38 D, respectively. This higher rate of right eye dominance in males was seen at all levels of SE refractive error. Mean BSCVA was 20/19 in both right and left eyes (P>.05) with a mean SE of -2.25 +/- 3.63 D and -2.26 +/- 3.66 D in the right and left eyes, respectively. Neither mean SE difference nor BSCVA difference between eyes was found to correlate with motor eye dominance.
CONCLUSIONS: Gender appears to be a factor when testing ocular dominance but not SE refractive error. The hole-in-the-card dominance test is a method that is easy to perform for both patients and clinicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18811110     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20080901-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  7 in total

1.  Laterality of amblyopia.

Authors:  Michael Repka; Kurt Simons; Raymond Kraker
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Comparing accommodative function between the dominant and non-dominant eye.

Authors:  Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Colm McAlinden; Abbas Azimi; Mina Sobhani; Eirini Skiadaresi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Interocular asymmetry of choroidal thickness and vascularity index measurements in normal eyes assessed by swept-source optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jie Lu; Hao Zhou; Yingying Shi; James Choe; Mengxi Shen; Liang Wang; Kelly Chen; Qinqin Zhang; William J Feuer; Giovanni Gregori; Philip J Rosenfeld; Ruikang K Wang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-01

4.  Neural correlates of the eye dominance effect in human face perception: the left-visual-field superiority for faces revisited.

Authors:  Wookyoung Jung; Joong-Gu Kang; Hyeonjin Jeon; Miseon Shim; Ji Sun Kim; Hyun-Sung Leem; Seung-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Elucidation of the more myopic eye in anisometropia: the interplay of laterality, ocular dominance, and anisometropic magnitude.

Authors:  Siyu Jiang; Zheyi Chen; Hua Bi; Ruijing Xia; Ting Shen; Ling Zhou; Jun Jiang; Bin Zhang; Fan Lu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Enhancement for Residual Refractive Error after Primary LASIK.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Noor F Basharat; Nour Bundogji; Emilie L Ungricht; Ines M Darquea; Matthew E Conley; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Dominant Eye and Visual Evoked Potential of Patients with Myopic Anisometropia.

Authors:  Qing Wang; Yili Wu; Wenwen Liu; Lin Gao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.