Literature DB >> 18810609

Assessing the reliability of the Gambling Functional Assessment.

Joseph C Miller1, Ellen Meier, Jeffrey N Weatherly.   

Abstract

Dixon and Johnson (Analysis of Gambling Behavior 2007, 1:44-49) introduced the Gambling Functional Assessment (GFA), which attempts to identify the consequences that may be maintaining a person's gambling behavior. The present study had 949 introductory psychology students complete the GFA, with 124 of them completing the measure a second time 12 weeks later. Measures of internal consistency were quite good regardless of whether "non-gamblers" were included or excluded. Test-retest reliability was somewhat mixed, with Escape scores yielding substandard coefficients, especially among females. Both internal and test-retest reliability were typically poorer for female respondents. In general, the GFA performed within the limits of acceptable reliability, and coefficients compared favorably with similar measures. Future investigations will need to determine the reliability and validity of the instrument, especially as it pertains to its intended population, pathological gamblers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18810609     DOI: 10.1007/s10899-008-9109-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gambl Stud        ISSN: 1050-5350


  6 in total

1.  Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).

Authors:  Randy Stinchfield
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  An assessment of the validity and reliability of the SOGS-RA.

Authors:  Christiane Poulin
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2002

3.  Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research.

Authors:  N S Jacobson; P Truax
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1991-02

4.  Testing the construct validity of Dixon and Johnson's (2007) Gambling Functional Assessment.

Authors:  Joseph C Miller; Ellen Meier; Jennifer Muehlenkamp; Jeffrey N Weatherly
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2008-07-09

5.  The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers.

Authors:  H R Lesieur; S B Blume
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of a measure of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling.

Authors:  Randy Stinchfield
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 18.112

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Assessing the reliability of the Gambling Functional Assessment: Revised.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Weatherly; Joseph C Miller; Kevin S Montes; Chase Rost
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2012-06

2.  Differences in cognitive distortions between pathological and non-pathological gamblers with preferences for chance or skill games.

Authors:  Helga Myrseth; Geir Scott Brunborg; Magnus Eidem
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2010-12

3.  The Inventory of Gambling Situations in problem and pathological gamblers seeking alcohol and drug abuse treatment.

Authors:  Nancy M Petry; Carla J Rash; Carlos Blanco
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.157

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.