Literature DB >> 18810544

Proficiency-gain curve for an advanced laparoscopic procedure defined by observation clinical human reliability assessment (OCHRA).

M Talebpour1, A Alijani, G B Hanna, Z Moosa, B Tang, Alfred Cuschieri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no established method for defining when a surgeon reaches the proficiency plateau in performing a specific operation. The published literature refers to "learning curves" based on retrospective evaluation of operative time, conversion rates, morbidity etc., which lack objectivity and do not address individual human factors. A more useful study of the gain in proficiency by the individual surgeon for a particular operation may be obtained using observational clinical-human reliability assessment (OCHRA).
METHODS: Following an 8-month fellowship in advanced laparoscopic surgery, the surgeon M.T. performed, independently at his own hospital, a prospective series of 20 palliative bypass operations for advanced gastric or pancreatic cancer. Unedited videotapes of gastro-jejunostomy (GJ) or cholecysto-jejunostomy (CJ) were analyzed independently in the training institution by the OCHRA technique.
RESULTS: For this surgeon proficiency in executing laparoscopic palliative bypass was reached after the 14th anastomosis when efficient execution (reduction in operative time) was accompanied by significant reduction in technical errors and improved economy of movement (reduction of the economy of movement index from 7-5 to 3-2). The majority of errors were enacted in component tasks associated with intracorporeal suturing. The declining incidence of these errors with experience was an integral component of the proficiency-gain curve. The important performance-shaping factors identified were: concentration lapses (n=1,321), misjudgments (n=209), poor camera work (n=193), fatigue (n=128), and impaired coordination (n=108).
CONCLUSIONS: This study has confirmed that OCHRA can describe quantitatively the proficiency-gain curve for a laparoscopic operation and indicate the plateau stage when the individual surgeon attains maximal performance in the execution of a specific procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18810544     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0088-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  8 in total

1.  The tail of the learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A J Voitk; S G Tsao; S Ignatius
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the learning curve.

Authors:  Renaud Bollens; Sarbjinder Sandhu; Thierry Roumeguere; Thierry Quackels; Claude Schulman
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 3.  Nature of human error: implications for surgical practice.

Authors:  Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Laparoscopic colon resection early in the learning curve: what is the appropriate setting?

Authors:  Daniel J Reichenbach; A Darrel Tackett; James Harris; Diego Camacho; Edward A Graviss; Brendan Dewan; Ashley Vavra; Anquonette Stiles; William E Fisher; F Charles Brunicardi; John F Sweeney
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey.

Authors:  S B Archer; D W Brown; C D Smith; G D Branum; J G Hunter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Lest we forget the surgeon.

Authors: 
Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg       Date:  2003-09

7.  Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery--a human reliability analysis.

Authors:  P Joice; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Identification and categorization of technical errors by Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment (OCHRA) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  B Tang; G B Hanna; P Joice; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-11
  8 in total
  13 in total

1.  International consensus on safe techniques and error definitions in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Esther M Bonrath; Nicolas J Dedy; Boris Zevin; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  EAES recommendations on methodology of innovation management in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Edmund A M Neugebauer; Monika Becker; Gerhard F Buess; Alfred Cuschieri; Hans-Peter Dauben; Abe Fingerhut; Karl H Fuchs; Brigitte Habermalz; Leonid Lantsberg; Mario Morino; Stella Reiter-Theil; Gabriela Soskuty; Wolfgang Wayand; Thilo Welsch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Defining technical errors in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Esther M Bonrath; Nicolas J Dedy; Boris Zevin; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The learning curve in robotic distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Niccolò Napoli; Emanuele F Kauffmann; Vittorio Grazio Perrone; Mario Miccoli; Stefania Brozzetti; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-05-20

5.  Development, validation and implementation of a monitoring tool for training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the English National Training Program.

Authors:  Danilo Miskovic; Susannah M Wyles; Fiona Carter; Mark G Coleman; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Proficiency in oocyte retrieval: how many procedures are necessary for training?

Authors:  Kara N Goldman; Kimberly S Moon; Belinda J Yauger; Mark D Payson; James H Segars; Barbara J Stegmann
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Training programs influence in the learning curve of laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Raquel Sánchez-Santos; Sergio Estévez; Catherine Tomé; Sonia González; Antonia Brox; Raul Nicolás; Rosario Crego; Miguel Piñón; Carles Masdevall; Antonio Torres
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Surgical timing after chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer, analysis of technique (STARRCAT): results of a feasibility multi-centre randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  J D Foster; P Ewings; S Falk; E J Cooper; H Roach; N P West; B A Williams-Yesson; G B Hanna; N K Francis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  3D laparoscopy does not reduce operative duration or errors in day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Katie E Schwab; Nathan J Curtis; Martin B Whyte; Ralph V Smith; Timothy A Rockall; Karen Ballard; Iain C Jourdan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Creation of a universal language for surgical procedures using the step-by-step framework.

Authors:  T Nazari; E J Vlieger; M E W Dankbaar; J J G van Merriënboer; J F Lange; T Wiggers
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-04-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.