Literature DB >> 18809849

Combining ethical considerations with recruitment and follow-up strategies for partner violence victimization research.

T K Logan1, Robert Walker, Lisa Shannon, Jennifer Cole.   

Abstract

In general, the literature on research ethics and the literature on recruitment and retention of research participants tend to be separated by different purposes and principles. This article uses multiple methods to compile information about research ethics with vulnerable participants as well as with recruitment and follow-up strategies, including (a) literature reviews, (b) key informant interviews, (c) focus group interviews, (d) a pilot study to test ideas for study implementation, and (e) documentation of recruitment and follow-up efforts for a longitudinal study of 757 women with partner violence victimization experiences. This article shows how considering research ethics may actually enhance recruitment and follow-up strategies with women experiencing partner violence victimization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18809849     DOI: 10.1177/1077801208323976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Violence Against Women        ISSN: 1077-8012


  7 in total

1.  Reactions to Dating Violence Research: Do Difficulties with Distress Tolerance Increase Negative Reactions?

Authors:  Ryan C Shorey; Jeniimarie Febres; Hope Brasfield; Heather Zucosky; Tara L Cornelius; Gregory L Stuart
Journal:  J Fam Violence       Date:  2013-07-01

2.  Males' Reactions to Participating in Research on Dating Violence Victimization and Childhood Abuse.

Authors:  Ryan C Shorey; Heather Zucosky; Jeniimarie Febres; Hope Brasfield; Gregory L Stuart
Journal:  J Aggress Maltreat Trauma       Date:  2013-04-29

3.  A global collaboration to study intimate partner violence-related head trauma: The ENIGMA consortium IPV working group.

Authors:  Carrie Esopenko; Jessica Meyer; Elisabeth A Wilde; Amy D Marshall; David F Tate; Alexander P Lin; Inga K Koerte; Kimberly B Werner; Emily L Dennis; Ashley L Ware; Nicola L de Souza; Deleene S Menefee; Kristen Dams-O'Connor; Dan J Stein; Erin D Bigler; Martha E Shenton; Kathy S Chiou; Judy L Postmus; Kathleen Monahan; Brenda Eagan-Johnson; Paul van Donkelaar; Tricia L Merkley; Carmen Velez; Cooper B Hodges; Hannah M Lindsey; Paula Johnson; Andrei Irimia; Matthew Spruiell; Esther R Bennett; Ashley Bridwell; Glynnis Zieman; Frank G Hillary
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.978

4.  Methodological and Ethical Challenges in a Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial of a Domestic Violence Intervention.

Authors:  Laura Tarzia; Jodie Valpied; Jane Koziol-McLain; Nancy Glass; Kelsey Hegarty
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Prospective evaluation of intimate partner violence in fracture clinics (PRAISE-2): protocol for a multicentre pilot prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kim Madden
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2018-06-15

6.  The coMforT study of a trauma-informed mindfulness intervention for women who have experienced domestic violence and abuse: a protocol for an intervention refinement and individually randomized parallel feasibility trial.

Authors:  Katherine Pitt; Gene S Feder; Alison Gregory; Claire Hawcroft; David Kessler; Alice Malpass; Sarah Millband; Richard Morris; Stan Zammit; Natalia V Lewis
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2020-02-28

7.  Minimizing risks and monitoring safety of an antenatal care intervention to mitigate domestic violence among young Indian women: The Dil Mil trial.

Authors:  Suneeta Krishnan; Kalyani Subbiah; Prabha Chandra; Krishnamachari Srinivasan
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.