Literature DB >> 18809532

Increasing walking in college students using a pedometer intervention: differences according to body mass index.

Erica M Jackson1, Amy Howton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The researchers assessed the effectiveness of a pedometer intervention and differences in walking behaviors according to body mass index (BMI). PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred ninety college students completed the intervention from January to February 2005.
METHODS: Participants wore pedometers 5 days per week for 12 weeks and completed questionnaires assessing demographic information. The authors calculated daily step averages for weeks 1, 6, and 12. They then classified students as underweight (UW), normal weight (NW), or overweight/obese, by BMI. The authors analyzed data using repeated-measures analysis of variance.
RESULTS: The average number of daily steps increased from week 1 to week 6 (p < .001) and week 12 (p = .002). UW participants reported the fewest steps at each time point, but the difference was significant only when compared with NW participants (p = .03).
CONCLUSIONS: These results support the effectiveness of a pedometer intervention to increase walking in college students. Health benefits other than weight management should be emphasized to maximize the effects for all students.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18809532     DOI: 10.3200/JACH.57.2.159-164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Health        ISSN: 0744-8481


  10 in total

1.  Types of Interventions Targeting Dietary, Physical Activity, and Weight-Related Outcomes among University Students: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Katerina Belogianni; Christine Baldwin
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 2.  Interventions for weight gain prevention during the transition to young adulthood: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Melissa N Laska; Jennifer E Pelletier; Nicole I Larson; Mary Story
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Using an alternate reality game to increase physical activity and decrease obesity risk of college students.

Authors:  Jeanne D Johnston; Anne P Massey; Rickie Lee Marker-Hoffman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-07-01

4.  Diet and Physical Activity Intervention Strategies for College Students.

Authors:  Yannica Theda S Martinez; Brook E Harmon; Claudio R Nigg; Erin O Bantum; Shaila Strayhorn
Journal:  Health Behav Policy Rev       Date:  2016-07

5.  Objectively Measured Physical Activity in Patients After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  David R Bell; Karin A Pfeiffer; Lisa A Cadmus-Bertram; Stephanie M Trigsted; Adam Kelly; Eric G Post; Joseph M Hart; Dane B Cook; Warren R Dunn; Christopher Kuenze
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Effect of the SNS-Based Physical Activity-Related Psychological Intervention on Physical Activity and Psychological Constructs among Inactive University Students.

Authors:  Youngho Kim; Jonghwa Lee
Journal:  Int J Clin Health Psychol       Date:  2022-04-09

7.  Testing a workplace physical activity intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rosemary R C McEachan; Rebecca J Lawton; Cath Jackson; Mark Conner; David M Meads; Robert M West
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 6.457

8.  Effectiveness of a smartphone app in increasing physical activity amongst male adults: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Tim Harries; Parisa Eslambolchilar; Ruth Rettie; Chris Stride; Simon Walton; Hugo C van Woerden
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Investing in college students: the role of the fitness tracker.

Authors:  Jodee A Schaben; Stacy Furness
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2018-04-04

10.  The effects of daily step goals of 10,000, 12,500, and 15,000 steps per day on neural activity to food cues: A 24-week dose-response randomized trial.

Authors:  Sharla E Compton; Michael J Larson; James D LeCheminant; Larry A Tucker; Bruce W Bailey
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 3.405

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.