Literature DB >> 18809423

Attention to upside-down faces: An exception to the inversion effect.

Markus Bindemann1, A Mike Burton.   

Abstract

When faces are turned upside-down, many aspects of face processing are severely disrupted. Here we report an instance where this face inversion effect is not found. In a visual cueing paradigm an inverted face was paired with an inverted object in a cue display, followed by a target in one of the cue locations (Experiment 1). Responses were faster to face-cued targets, indicating an attention bias for inverted faces. When upright and inverted face cues were paired in Experiment 2, no attention bias for either cue type was found, suggesting that attention was drawn equally to both types of stimuli. Despite this, attention could be biased selectively toward upright or inverted faces in Experiment 3, by manipulating the predictiveness of either type of cue, which shows that observers can distinguish upright and inverted faces under these conditions. A fourth experiment provided a replication of Experiment 2 with an extended stimulus set and increased task demands. These findings suggest that visual attributes that can influence the allocation of an observer's attention to faces are available in both upright and inverted orientations.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18809423     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Infrequent faces bias social attention differently in manual and oculomotor measures.

Authors:  Effie J Pereira; Elina Birmingham; Jelena Ristic
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The role of gamma-band activity in the representation of faces: reduced activity in the fusiform face area in congenital prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Christian Dobel; Markus Junghöfer; Thomas Gruber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Oculomotor guidance and capture by irrelevant faces.

Authors:  Christel Devue; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Visual perspective-taking in complex natural scenes.

Authors:  Paola Del Sette; Markus Bindemann; Heather J Ferguson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.138

5.  Efficient search for a face by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Masaki Tomonaga; Tomoko Imura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Contextually-Based Social Attention Diverges across Covert and Overt Measures.

Authors:  Effie J Pereira; Elina Birmingham; Jelena Ristic
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-10

7.  Isolated face features are sufficient to elicit ultra-rapid and involuntary orienting responses toward faces.

Authors:  Louise Kauffmann; Sarah Khazaz; Carole Peyrin; Nathalie Guyader
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Faces capture the visuospatial attention of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): evidence from a cueing experiment.

Authors:  Masaki Tomonaga; Tomoko Imura
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.172

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.