AIM: This paper is a report of a systematic review and meta-ethnography of the experience of heavy menstrual bleeding. BACKGROUND: Heavy menstrual bleeding is common. Not all women seeking help have heavy menstrual bleeding as measured objectively and, conversely, some who do have this problem do not seek help. DATA SOURCES: Seven electronic databases were searched in 2004 and updated in 2008, and supplemented with hand-searching. METHOD: We identified four papers describing qualitative research among women with heavy menstrual bleeding. Key themes and concepts were extracted and synthesised using meta-ethnography, the key process of which is translation, identifying similar or contradictory findings in primary research. In the updated search three papers were identified. FINDINGS: Three papers were largely descriptive. These provided support for the fourth paper's conceptual framework of a lay model of heavy menstrual bleeding which shows little overlap with the traditional clinical definition. Details of physical, practical and emotional elements of this model were identified. A matrix of uncertainties were identified suggesting reasons why women may or may not seek medical help for heavy menstrual bleeding. Women and healthcare professionals may conspire to privilege blood loss over other symptoms and the disease model of heavy menstrual bleeding is little help to either. Two papers from the updated search were also largely descriptive. The third interpreted key elements of the lay model as relating to the need for concealment demanded by 'menstrual etiquette'. CONCLUSION: A lay model of heavy menstrual bleeding is proposed, detailing key physical, social and emotional impacts that women find problematic.
AIM: This paper is a report of a systematic review and meta-ethnography of the experience of heavy menstrual bleeding. BACKGROUND:Heavy menstrual bleeding is common. Not all women seeking help have heavy menstrual bleeding as measured objectively and, conversely, some who do have this problem do not seek help. DATA SOURCES: Seven electronic databases were searched in 2004 and updated in 2008, and supplemented with hand-searching. METHOD: We identified four papers describing qualitative research among women with heavy menstrual bleeding. Key themes and concepts were extracted and synthesised using meta-ethnography, the key process of which is translation, identifying similar or contradictory findings in primary research. In the updated search three papers were identified. FINDINGS: Three papers were largely descriptive. These provided support for the fourth paper's conceptual framework of a lay model of heavy menstrual bleeding which shows little overlap with the traditional clinical definition. Details of physical, practical and emotional elements of this model were identified. A matrix of uncertainties were identified suggesting reasons why women may or may not seek medical help for heavy menstrual bleeding. Women and healthcare professionals may conspire to privilege blood loss over other symptoms and the disease model of heavy menstrual bleeding is little help to either. Two papers from the updated search were also largely descriptive. The third interpreted key elements of the lay model as relating to the need for concealment demanded by 'menstrual etiquette'. CONCLUSION: A lay model of heavy menstrual bleeding is proposed, detailing key physical, social and emotional impacts that women find problematic.
Authors: Erica E Marsh; Maureen E Brocks; Marissa S Ghant; Hannah S Recht; Melissa Simon Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: David D Rahn; Husam Abed; Vivian W Sung; Kristen A Matteson; Rebecca G Rogers; Michelle Y Morrill; Matthew D Barber; Joseph I Schaffer; Thomas L Wheeler; Ethan M Balk; Katrin Uhlig Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2010-08-12 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Kristen A Matteson; Christina A Raker; Stephanie B Pinto; Dana Marie Scott; Gary N Frishman Journal: J Reprod Med Date: 2012 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 0.142