Literature DB >> 18808574

Nurses' responses to ethical dilemmas in nursing practice: meta-analysis.

Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé1, Shigeko Izumi, Nelda S Godfrey, Kris Denhaerynck.   

Abstract

AIM: This paper is a report of a study to explore nurses' responses to ethical dilemmas in daily nursing practice.
BACKGROUND: Concern about nurses' ethical competence is growing. Most nurses perceived that there were barriers in their work environment to ethical practice, compromising their ability to perform ethically. Since most research focuses on contextual barriers to nurses' ethical practice, little is known about how nurses involve themselves in ethical decision-making and action in daily care.
METHOD: A meta-analysis of nurses' ethical behaviour was conducted using data from nine studies in four countries (n = 1592 registered nurses). In all studies, the Ethical Behaviour Test was used to measure nurses' ethical responses, based on an adapted version of Kohlberg's theory of moral development. Data were analysed using random-intercept regression analysis.
FINDINGS: All groups, except the expert group, displayed a uniform pattern of conventional ethical reasoning and practice. When nurses were faced with ethical dilemmas, they tended to use conventions as their predominant decision-guiding criteria rather than patients' personal needs and well-being.
CONCLUSION: Conformist practice (following conventions rather than pursuing good for the patient) constitutes a major barrier for nurses to take the appropriate ethical actions, as creativity and critical reflection are absent. There is an urgent need to find ways to promote nurses' ethical development from conventional to postconventional ethical practice. More research is needed to strengthen existing empirical evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18808574     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04702.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  16 in total

1.  Special issue: transforming nursing in South Africa.

Authors:  Laetitia C Rispel
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 2.640

2.  Towards the responsible conduct of scientific research: is ethics education enough?

Authors:  Tatyana Novossiolova; Judi Sture
Journal:  Med Confl Surviv       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar

3.  "It's intense, you know." Nurses' experiences in caring for patients requesting euthanasia.

Authors:  Yvonne Denier; Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé; Nele De Bal; Chris Gastmans
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2009-04-18

4.  'Practice what you preach': Nurses' perspectives on the Code of Ethics and Service Pledge in five South African hospitals.

Authors:  Janine White; Maureen Phakoe; Laetitia C Rispel
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 2.640

5.  Ethical behavior of nurses in decision-making in Iran.

Authors:  Hossein Ebrahimi; Mansoure Nikravesh; Fatemeh Oskouie; Fazlollah Ahmadi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

6.  Is privacy a problem during bedside handovers? A practice-oriented discussion paper.

Authors:  Simon Malfait; Ann Van Hecke; Wim Van Biesen; Kristof Eeckloo
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.874

7.  Ethical competence in a profession: Healthcare professionals' views.

Authors:  Jessica Hemberg; Håkan Hemberg
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-05-18

8.  Self-evaluated ethical competence of a practicing physiotherapist: a national study in Finland.

Authors:  Kati Kulju; Riitta Suhonen; Pauli Puukka; Anna Tolvanen; Helena Leino-Kilpi
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Explaining professionalism in moral reasoning: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Farahnaz Kamali; Alireza Yousefy; Nikoo Yamani
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2019-06-26

10.  Clinical ethics dilemmas in a low-income setting - a national survey among physicians in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Ingrid Miljeteig; Frehiwot Defaye; Dawit Desalegn; Marion Danis
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.