Literature DB >> 18808476

A national snapshot of local school wellness policies.

Alicia Moag-Stahlberg1, Nora Howley, Lorry Luscri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The federal mandate for local wellness policies (LWP) provides an unprecedented opportunity to improve schools' practices that support student health, which, in turn, supports academic achievement. With a full agenda and budget challenges, districts need resources and support to turn policies into sustainable practices. The purpose of this study was to assess district policy goals and compare them to the federal mandate and benchmarks of best practices. It is hoped that this information will lead to development of specific assistance in the areas of policy implementation, evaluation, and revision.
METHODS: Action for Healthy Kids (AFHK) collected a convenience sample of 256 approved LWP. The sample included districts with small, medium, and large student enrollment from every state (except Hawaii). Policies were compared to federal requirements and the AFHK Wellness Policy Fundamentals, a tool which documents best practices for nutrition and physical activity in schools.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight percent of policies sampled were consistent with the mandates set forth in the law. Thirty-two percent did not address 1 or more goal areas set by the federal mandate with 15% not addressing goals for evaluation and monitoring. None of the policies addressed all components of AFHK's Fundamentals. Less than 1% addressed all 4 of the evaluation components. Teacher requirements and training for nutrition and physical education were addressed by 43% and 45% of policies, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study's findings indicate schools will need assistance to meet each of the mandates provided by the federal mandate. Areas lacking attention in policies, yet essential for sustaining wellness practices, include assurances of qualified staff, opportunities for staff development, and implementation, evaluation, and revision of the policy.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18808476     DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00344.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sch Health        ISSN: 0022-4391            Impact factor:   2.118


  9 in total

1.  School district wellness policy quality and weight-related outcomes among high school students in Minnesota.

Authors:  Pamela K Hoffman; Cynthia S Davey; Nicole Larson; Katherine Y Grannon; Carlie Hanson; Marilyn S Nanney
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2016-02-05

2.  Physical activity opportunities associated with fitness and weight status among adolescents in low-income communities.

Authors:  Kristine A Madsen; Wendi Gosliner; Gail Woodward-Lopez; Patricia B Crawford
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2009-11

3.  Strength and Comprehensiveness of School Wellness Policies in Southeastern US School Districts.

Authors:  Melissa J Cox; Susan T Ennett; Christopher L Ringwalt; Sean M Hanley; James M Bowling
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.118

4.  School Wellness Committees Are Associated With Lower Body Mass Index Z-Scores and Improved Dietary Intakes in US Children: The Healthy Communities Study.

Authors:  Lauren E Au; Patricia B Crawford; Gail Woodward-Lopez; Klara Gurzo; Janice Kao; Karen L Webb; Lorrene D Ritchie
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.118

Review 5.  Physical activity and healthy eating environmental audit tools in youth care settings: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rahma Ajja; Michael W Beets; Jessica Chandler; Andrew T Kaczynski; Dianne S Ward
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Little association between wellness policies and school-reported nutrition practices.

Authors:  Jennifer F Lucarelli; Katherine Alaimo; Elaine S Belansky; Ellen Mang; Richard Miles; Deanne K Kelleher; Deborah Bailey; Nicholas B Drzal; Hui Liu
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2014-09-23

7.  Strength and comprehensiveness of district school wellness policies predict policy implementation at the school level.

Authors:  Marlene B Schwartz; Kathryn E Henderson; Jennifer Falbe; Sarah A Novak; Christopher M Wharton; Michael W Long; Meghan L O'Connell; Susan S Fiore
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.118

8.  Evaluation of the healthy schools program: Part I. Interim progress.

Authors:  Margaret Beam; Ginny Ehrlich; Jessica Donze Black; Audrey Block; Laura C Leviton
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Developmental perspectives on nutrition and obesity from gestation to adolescence.

Authors:  Layla Esposito; Jennifer O Fisher; Julie A Mennella; Deanna M Hoelscher; Terry T Huang
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 2.830

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.