Literature DB >> 18807571

A retrospective analysis of sandblasted, acid-etched implants with reduced healing times with an observation period of up to 5 years.

Katja Nelson1, Wiebke Semper, Detlef Hildebrand, Hakan Ozyuvaci.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rate of 2 different implant systems with sandblasted and acid-etched modified surfaces loaded after reduced healing periods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred seventeen patients with a mean observation period of 3.75 years (24 to 61 months) were included in this evaluation. Chart reviews of a standardized recall program were evaluated. All 532 placed implants showed an unloaded healing time of 6 weeks in the mandible and 12 weeks in the maxilla. At abutment placement a torque value of 35 Ncm was one of the primary variables, and the success of the implants over time was determined by the criteria of Buser et al. The survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method, and the probability of an event within 1 group independent of time was evaluated using the chi-square test and Fisher exact test.
RESULTS: Of the 532 implants, 235 were placed in female and 297 in male patients; 448 implants were located in the maxilla and 84 in the mandible. Three implants were lost prior to abutment connection in 3 patients. Life table analyses show an overall success rate of 99.4% at 5 years, as no implants were lost after abutment connection. There was no significant association of the implant type (P = .185), gender (P = .99), or jaw (maxilla/mandible; P = .06) and the survival of the implants within this study.
CONCLUSION: Based on the data found in this investigation, it can be concluded that implants with sandblasted, acid-etched surfaces can be restored after a 6- to 12-week healing period with a high predictability of success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18807571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of the reproducibility of results of a new peri-implantitis assessment system (implant success index) with the Misch classification.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Abrishami; Siamak Sabour; Maryam Nasiri; Reza Amid; Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-04-28

2.  Frequency of Dental Implants Placed in the Esthetic Zone in Dental Clinic of Tehran University: A Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Amir Alireza Rasouli Ghahroudi; Ali Homayouni; Amir Reza Rokn; Fatemeh Kia; Mohammad Javad Kharazifard; Afshin Khorsand
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-12

3.  Influence of the connection design and titanium grades of the implant complex on resistance under static loading.

Authors:  Su-Jung Park; Suk-Won Lee; Richard Leesungbok; Su-Jin Ahn
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments.

Authors:  Sven Marcus Beschnidt; Claudio Cacaci; Kerem Dedeoglu; Detlef Hildebrand; Helfried Hulla; Gerhard Iglhaut; Gerald Krennmair; Markus Schlee; Paul Sipos; Andres Stricker; Karl-Ludwig Ackermann
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-11-02

5.  Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year follow-up.

Authors:  Karl-Ludwig Ackermann; Thomas Barth; Claudio Cacaci; Steffen Kistler; Markus Schlee; Michael Stiller
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2020-04-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.