Literature DB >> 18806728

Influence of interactions between immunosuppressive drugs on therapeutic drug monitoring.

Dirk R Kuypers1.   

Abstract

With the emergence of more immunosuppressive drug combinations in transplantation, the number and complexity of drug interactions have increased and constitute a growing challenge for clinicians. Especially, clinically relevant immunosuppressive drug interactions require prompt identification, intensified monitoring of drug concentrations and adequate dosing responses. The drug interaction whereby cyclosporine, as opposed to tacrolimus, inhibits the enterohepatic (re)circulation of mycophenolic acid and its inactive MPAG metabolite, will result in significantly lower dose-corrected MPA concentrations in cyclosporine-treated patients which in turn will lead to early clinical MPA underexposure in 50% of patients receiving 2 grams of MMF per day. Also, when reducing or withdrawing cyclosporine or switching to tacrolimus as alternative calcineurin-inhibitor and vice versa, this important drug interactions needs to be taken into consideration. The combination of cyclosporine and the proliferation signal inhibitors (PSI) sirolimus and everolimus, requires dose reductions of both drugs because of a well-established synergistic drug interaction which will lead to increased nephrotoxicity when left unadjusted. Despite the observations that clinically important drug interactions between PSI and tacrolimus are apparently lacking, switching between calcineurin-inhibitors in renal recipients requires intensified monitoring of PSI concentrations. Finally, when corticosteroid doses are substantially reduced or completely withdrawn from a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen, a moderate increase of tacrolimus concentrations will ensue, albeit without any clearly described clinical consequences. More attention for clinically relevant immunosuppressive drug interactions is warranted in this era of tailor-made transplantation medicine whereby an increasing number of immunosuppressive drug combinations are, not uniquely, but rather sequentially used during the life course of a transplanted organ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18806728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transplant        ISSN: 1425-9524            Impact factor:   1.530


  16 in total

1.  Long-term kidney allograft function and survival in prednisone-free regimens: tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus tacrolimus/sirolimus.

Authors:  Darshika Chhabra; Anton I Skaro; Joseph R Leventhal; Pranav Dalal; Gaurav Shah; Edward Wang; Lorenzo Gallon
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of everolimus in renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Dirk Jan A R Moes; Rogier R Press; Jan den Hartigh; Tahar van der Straaten; Johan W de Fijter; Henk-Jan Guchelaar
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Novel polymorphisms associated with tacrolimus trough concentrations: results from a multicenter kidney transplant consortium.

Authors:  Pamala A Jacobson; William S Oetting; Ann M Brearley; Robert Leduc; Weihau Guan; David Schladt; Arthur J Matas; Vishal Lamba; Bruce A Julian; Rosalyn B Mannon; Ajay Israni
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  The interactions of age, sex, body mass index, genetics, and steroid weight-based doses on tacrolimus dosing requirement after adult kidney transplantation.

Authors:  P Stratta; M Quaglia; T Cena; R Antoniotti; R Fenoglio; A Menegotto; D Ferrante; A Genazzani; S Terrazzino; C Magnani
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  Everolimus and sirolimus in transplantation-related but different.

Authors:  Jost Klawitter; Björn Nashan; Uwe Christians
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 4.250

6.  Practical management of boceprevir and immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus recurrence.

Authors:  Audrey Coilly; Valérie Furlan; Bruno Roche; Caroline Barau; Coralie Noël; Laurence Bonhomme-Faivre; Teresa Maria Antonini; Anne-Marie Roque-Afonso; Didier Samuel; Anne-Marie Taburet; Jean-Charles Duclos-Vallée
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Immunotherapy in elderly transplant recipients: a guide to clinically significant drug interactions.

Authors:  Dirk R J Kuypers
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Sirolimus and everolimus clearance in maintenance kidney and liver transplant recipients: diagnostic efficiency of the concentration/dose ratio for the prediction of trough steady-state concentrations.

Authors:  Lorena Bouzas; Jesús Hermida; J Carlos Tutor
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.384

9.  Mycophenolic acid formulations in adult renal transplantation - update on efficacy and tolerability.

Authors:  Déla Golshayan; M Pascual; Bruno Vogt
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  The Peripheral NK Cell Repertoire after Kidney Transplantation is Modulated by Different Immunosuppressive Drugs.

Authors:  Christine Neudoerfl; Bernadett J Mueller; Cornelia Blume; Kerstin Daemen; Maja Stevanovic-Meyer; Jana Keil; Frank Lehner; Hermann Haller; Christine S Falk
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.