Literature DB >> 18806429

Angular Specificity and Test Mode Specificity of Isometric and lsokinetic Strength Training *.

J J Knapik, R H Mawdsley, M U Ramos.   

Abstract

This study examined the angular specificity and test mode specificity of strength training. Six males and six females (X = 22.6 years) were assigned to groups which trained either isometrically (90 degrees ) or isokinetically (30 degrees /second). They trained their left elbow extensors at 80% of their maximum voluntary contraction on a modified Cybex(R) apparatus for 10 weeks, three sessions per week, with 50 contractions per session. Before and after training, both groups were tested isometrically (70, 90, 110 degrees ) and isokinetically (30 degrees /second). When tested isometrically, both groups improved equally, and strength was increased at all three test angles to about the same extent. When tested isokinetically, both groups improved, but the isokinetic group improved to a greater extent. In conclusion, no angular specificity of training was demonstrated within 20 degrees of the training angle, and no test mode specificity was seen for isometric testing. However, isometric training showed less transfer to an isokinetic test. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1983;5(2):58-65.

Year:  1983        PMID: 18806429     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1983.5.2.58

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  17 in total

1.  A mathematical model of neuromuscular adaptation to resistance training and its application in a computer simulation of accommodating loads.

Authors:  Ognjen Arandjelović
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Optimal effort investment for overcoming the weakest point: new insights from a computational model of neuromuscular adaptation.

Authors:  Ognjen Arandjelović
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Neural adaptations to resistive exercise: mechanisms and recommendations for training practices.

Authors:  David A Gabriel; Gary Kamen; Gail Frost
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Effects of unilateral isometric strength training on joint angle specificity and cross-training.

Authors:  J P Weir; T J Housh; L L Weir; G O Johnson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1995

Review 5.  Core Stability in Athletes: A Critical Analysis of Current Guidelines.

Authors:  Klaus Wirth; Hagen Hartmann; Christoph Mickel; Elena Szilvas; Michael Keiner; Andre Sander
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Specificity of joint angle in isometric training.

Authors:  T A Kitai; D G Sale
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1989

7.  Prescription of resistance training for healthy populations.

Authors:  C J Hass; M S Feigenbaum; B A Franklin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Comparison of the shake weight(®) modality exercises when compared to traditional dumbbells.

Authors:  Jordan M Glenn; Isaac Cook; Ro Di Brezzo; Michelle Gray; Jennifer L Vincenzo
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 9.  Achilles and patellar tendinopathy loading programmes : a systematic review comparing clinical outcomes and identifying potential mechanisms for effectiveness.

Authors:  Peter Malliaras; Christian J Barton; Neil D Reeves; Henning Langberg
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Algorithmic extraction of smartphone accelerometer-derived mechano-biological descriptors of resistance exercise is robust to changes in intensity and velocity.

Authors:  Claudio Viecelli; David Aguayo; Samuel Dällenbach; David Graf; Basil Achermann; Ernst Hafen; Rudolf M Füchslin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.