PURPOSE: The clinical radiation responses of different organs vary widely and likely depend on the intrinsic radiosensitivities of their different cell populations. Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most deleterious form of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation, and the cells' capacity to rejoin radiation-induced DSBs is known to affect their intrinsic radiosensitivity. To date, only little is known about the induction and processing of radiation-induced DSBs in complex normal tissues. Using an in vivo model with repair-proficient mice, the highly sensitive gammaH2AX immunofluorescence was established to investigate whether differences in DSB rejoining could account for the substantial differences in clinical radiosensitivity observed among normal tissues. METHODS AND MATERIALS: After whole body irradiation of C57BL/6 mice (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 Gy), the formation and rejoining of DSBs was analyzed by enumerating gammaH2AX foci in various organs representative of both early-responding (small intestine) and late-responding (lung, brain, heart, kidney) tissues. RESULTS: The linear dose correlation observed in all analyzed tissues indicated that gammaH2AX immunofluorescence allows for the accurate quantification of DSBs in complex organs. Strikingly, the various normal tissues exhibited identical kinetics for gammaH2AX foci loss, despite their clearly different clinical radiation responses. CONCLUSION: The identical kinetics of DSB rejoining measured in different organs suggest that tissue-specific differences in radiation responses are independent of DSB rejoining. This finding emphasizes the fundamental role of DSB repair in maintaining genomic integrity, thereby contributing to cellular viability and functionality and, thus, tissue homeostasis.
PURPOSE: The clinical radiation responses of different organs vary widely and likely depend on the intrinsic radiosensitivities of their different cell populations. Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most deleterious form of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation, and the cells' capacity to rejoin radiation-induced DSBs is known to affect their intrinsic radiosensitivity. To date, only little is known about the induction and processing of radiation-induced DSBs in complex normal tissues. Using an in vivo model with repair-proficient mice, the highly sensitive gammaH2AX immunofluorescence was established to investigate whether differences in DSB rejoining could account for the substantial differences in clinical radiosensitivity observed among normal tissues. METHODS AND MATERIALS: After whole body irradiation of C57BL/6 mice (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 Gy), the formation and rejoining of DSBs was analyzed by enumerating gammaH2AX foci in various organs representative of both early-responding (small intestine) and late-responding (lung, brain, heart, kidney) tissues. RESULTS: The linear dose correlation observed in all analyzed tissues indicated that gammaH2AX immunofluorescence allows for the accurate quantification of DSBs in complex organs. Strikingly, the various normal tissues exhibited identical kinetics for gammaH2AXfoci loss, despite their clearly different clinical radiation responses. CONCLUSION: The identical kinetics of DSB rejoining measured in different organs suggest that tissue-specific differences in radiation responses are independent of DSB rejoining. This finding emphasizes the fundamental role of DSB repair in maintaining genomic integrity, thereby contributing to cellular viability and functionality and, thus, tissue homeostasis.
Authors: Alesia N Ivashkevich; Olga A Martin; Andrea J Smith; Christophe E Redon; William M Bonner; Roger F Martin; Pavel N Lobachevsky Journal: Mutat Res Date: 2011-01-07 Impact factor: 2.433
Authors: K E Applegate; W Rühm; A Wojcik; M Bourguignon; A Brenner; K Hamasaki; T Imai; M Imaizumi; T Imaoka; S Kakinuma; T Kamada; N Nishimura; N Okonogi; K Ozasa; C E Rübe; A Sadakane; R Sakata; Y Shimada; K Yoshida; S Bouffler Journal: Radiat Environ Biophys Date: 2020-03-07 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Emad A Ahmed; Diane Agay; Gerrit Schrock; Michel Drouet; Viktor Meineke; Harry Scherthan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Claudia E Rübe; Andreas Fricke; Thomas A Widmann; Tobias Fürst; Henning Madry; Michael Pfreundschuh; Christian Rübe Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-03-07 Impact factor: 3.240