Literature DB >> 18805058

Adolescent varicocelectomy: postoperative catch-up growth is not secondary to lymphatic ligation.

Stephen A Poon1, Kristin A Kozakowski, G Joel Decastro, Carl K Gjertson, Kenneth I Glassberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The major indication for adolescent varicocelectomy is testicular asymmetry with the left testicle smaller than the right. Catch-up growth following surgery is one of the parameters used to assess efficacy of surgery. However, it is not clear whether this represents true tissue growth or increased interstitial fluid secondary to lymphatic obstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare catch-up growth in patients who underwent varicocelectomy with and without lymphatic preservation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 136 boys (mean age 15.1years) who had 10% or greater preoperative testicular asymmetry and underwent varicocelectomy between 1997 and 2006. Surgery was either a laparoscopic nonlymphatic sparing or laparoscopic lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy. All patients had pre- and postoperative ultrasound volume measurements at least 6months following surgery. The groups were compared for incidence of postoperative catch-up growth, achieving less than 10% testicular asymmetry.
RESULTS: After a mean follow up of 24.7months, catch-up growth was achieved in 62.8% of patients. There was no significant difference between the groups in regard to catch-up growth (51.7% vs 66.3%, P=0.193).
CONCLUSIONS: Since no significant difference was found between the laparoscopic nonlymphatic sparing and laparoscopic lymphatic sparing varicocelectomies, we conclude that lymphatic obstruction is not the cause of catch-up growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18805058     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  8 in total

Review 1.  Surgical techniques for the management of male infertility.

Authors:  Natalya A Lopushnyan; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Evaluation of testicular catch-up growth in adolescent microsurgical varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Fevzi Bedir; Ercüment Keskin; Mehmet Karabakan; İbrahim Karabulut; Fatih Kürşat Yılmazel; Ertuğrul Gazi Özbey; Yılmaz Aksoy; İsa Özbey
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

Review 3.  The dilemma of adolescent varicocele.

Authors:  Michael L Garcia-Roig; Andrew J Kirsch
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Update on the management of adolescent varicocele.

Authors:  Kenneth I Glassberg; Ruslan Korets
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2010-04-12

5.  The validity of testicular catch-up growth and serum FSH levels in the long-term postoperative assessment of laparoscopic varicocele correction in adolescents.

Authors:  Aniruddh Deshpande; Ralph Cohen; Irene Tsang; Geoff Ambler; Steven Fleming
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2011-01

6.  Management options of varicoceles.

Authors:  Peter Chan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-01

Review 7.  Current Issues in Adolescent Varicocele: Pediatric Urological Perspectives.

Authors:  Jae Min Chung; Sang Don Lee
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 5.400

Review 8.  My indications for treatment of the adolescent varicocele (and why?).

Authors:  Kenneth I Glassberg
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2014-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.