Literature DB >> 18804949

Impact of the introduction of endovascular aneurysm repair in high-risk patients on our practice of elective treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Jean-Marc Alsac1, Rabih Houbballah, Fady Francis, Nikolaos Paraskevas, Thierry Coppin, Olivier Cerceau, Yves Castier, Guy Leseche.   

Abstract

The aim of this work was to evaluate, in terms of activity and immediate postoperative results, the modifications of our elective surgical treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) resulting from the use of stent grafts to treat AAAs, following the recommendations issued by the French Health Products Safety Agency (AFSSAPS) in December 2003. This monocentric and retrospective study used the clinical data of patients operated on for asymptomatic AAA between January 2001 and December 2006. Endovascular treatment of AAAs with aortic stent grafts was introduced in our current practice in January 2004, following the recommendations of the AFSSAPS (high-risk patients for open surgery presenting with an AAA > or =50 mm). Group I was composed of patients operated on between January 2001 and December 2003 according to the standard open technique. Group II was composed of patients operated on between January 2004 and December 2006 with either standard open surgery or endovascular surgery. The main criteria of evaluation were the number of operated patients, their American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score of surgical risk, and the intrahospital morbidity and mortality. The number of treated patients significantly increased between these two periods (group I n = 49, group II n = 88, with 38 endovascular treatments; p < 0.001), without any changes in average age (70 vs. 72 years), percentage of men (93.7% vs. 95.5%), and mean AAA size (57.8 vs. 56 mm) between the two groups. ASA scores were significantly higher in group II (ASA III and IV, group I = 20.4% vs. group II = 55.7%; p < 0.0001), whereas the intrahospital mortality rate (4.1% vs. 3.4%) and the rate of major postoperative complications (16.3% vs. 11%) have remained stable. In group II, the median duration of hospitalization was significantly reduced (12 vs. 9 days, p < 0.001). In conclusion, in our center, following the AFSSAPS recommendations, the introduction of endovascular treatment has enabled us to electively treat a greater number of AAA patients with higher surgical risk, without aggravating the immediate postoperative results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18804949     DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  2 in total

1.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: long-term follow-up of endovascular versus open repair.

Authors:  Gabriele Piffaretti; Giovanni Mariscalco; Francesca Riva; Federico Fontana; Gianpaolo Carrafiello; Patrizio Castelli
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.318

2.  Risk factors and short and medium-term survival after open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Seleno Glauber de Jesus-Silva; Victor Rodrigues de Oliveira; Melissa Andreia de Moraes-Silva; Arturo Eduardo Krupa; Rodolfo Souza Cardoso
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.