Literature DB >> 18804577

A comparison of RhBMP-7 (OP-1) and autogenous graft for metaphyseal defects after osteotomy of the distal radius.

Ingri Ekrol1, Carol Hajducka, Charles Court-Brown, Margaret M McQueen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: SUMMARY AIM: The aim of the study was to demonstrate whether RhBMP-7 is an effective alternative to autogenous bone graft in the healing of metaphyseal defects in the distal radius following corrective osteotomies for symptomatic malunion after distal radial fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were entered into the study and were randomised to receive either RhBMP-7 or autogenous bone graft harvested from the ipsilateral iliac crest. Stabilisation of the osteotomy was either carried out with non- bridging external fixation or the pi-plate. Clinical, radiographic and functional review were carried out at regular intervals up to 1 year.
RESULTS: The first 10 patients were treated using non-bridging external fixation of the osteotomy. Two of the 4 patients treated with RhBMP-7 developed excessive osteolysis around the osteotomy site resulting in loss of the corrected position and non-union of the osteotomy. The other 2 patients healed at 13 weeks. The 6 patients treated with autogenous bone graft all healed at an average of 7 weeks, without any complications. It was postulated that the osteolysis was related to instability of the osteotomy site, and the use of external fixation was abandoned and replaced with internal fixation with a dorsal pi-plate. In the pi-plate group of patients, 10 were treated with autogenous bone graft and 10 with RhBMP-7. The bone graft patients healed at 7 weeks compared to 18 weeks for the RhBMP-7 patients, which was statistically significant (p = 0.019). The patients who received bone graft had complete filling of the metaphyseal defect radiologically. Five patients treated with RhBMP-7 healed at the volar cortex with a dorsal defect remaining at 1 year. Two patients developed non-union radiologically. Ten patients (3 in the RhBMP-7 and 7 in the bone graft groups) required plate removal for soft tissue complications.
CONCLUSION: RhBMP-7 does not confer the same stability as bone graft, allowing shear forces across the osteotomy site when used in conjunction with non-bridging external fixation, reducing the capacity for healing and resulting in osteolysis. Using the RhBMP-7 with a pi-plate resulted in healing of the osteotomy, but at a slower rate than autogenous bone graft.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18804577     DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1383(08)70018-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  21 in total

Review 1.  Recent biological trends in management of fracture non-union.

Authors:  Khaled M Emara; Ramy Ahmed Diab; Ahmed Khaled Emara
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-09-18

Review 2.  Bone morphogenetic proteins in fracture repair.

Authors:  Ivo Dumic-Cule; Mihaela Peric; Lucija Kucko; Lovorka Grgurevic; Marko Pecina; Slobodan Vukicevic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Bone regeneration using a freeze-dried 3D gradient-structured scaffold incorporating OIC-A006-loaded PLGA microspheres based on β-TCP/PLGA.

Authors:  Liulan Lin; Haitao Gao; Yangyang Dong
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Corrective osteotomies of the radius: Grafting or not?

Authors:  Raffaele Mugnai; Luigi Tarallo; Enrico Lancellotti; Francesco Zambianchi; Ettore Di Giovine; Fabio Catani; Roberto Adani
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-02-18

5.  Comparative Study of Early Health Care Use after Forearm Corrective Osteotomy.

Authors:  Jason Shrouder-Henry; Christine B Novak; Timothy Jackson; Heather L Baltzer
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2019-01-15

Review 6.  The potential impact of bone tissue engineering in the clinic.

Authors:  Ruchi Mishra; Tyler Bishop; Ian L Valerio; John P Fisher; David Dean
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 7.  The clinical use of bone morphogenetic proteins revisited: a novel biocompatible carrier device OSTEOGROW for bone healing.

Authors:  Slobodan Vukicevic; Hermann Oppermann; Donatella Verbanac; Morana Jankolija; Irena Popek; Jasna Curak; Jelena Brkljacic; Martina Pauk; Igor Erjavec; Igor Francetic; Ivo Dumic-Cule; Mislav Jelic; Dragan Durdevic; Tomislav Vlahovic; Ruder Novak; Vera Kufner; Tatjana Bordukalo Niksic; Marija Kozlovic; Zrinka Banic Tomisic; Jadranka Bubic-Spoljar; Ivancica Bastalic; Smiljka Vikic-Topic; Mihaela Peric; Marko Pecina; Lovorka Grgurevic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Growth factor delivery: how surface interactions modulate release in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  William J King; Paul H Krebsbach
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 9.  The use of bone grafts and substitutes in the treatment of distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Kagan Ozer; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 1.907

10.  Systemically available bone morphogenetic protein two and seven affect bone metabolism.

Authors:  Ivo Dumic-Cule; Jelena Brkljacic; Dunja Rogic; Tatjana Bordukalo Niksic; Ana Tikvica Luetic; Natasa Draca; Vera Kufner; Vladimir Trkulja; Lovorka Grgurevic; Slobodan Vukicevic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.