Literature DB >> 18803994

Retrospective assessment of Medicaid step-therapy prior authorization policy for atypical antipsychotic medications.

Joel F Farley1, Richard R Cline, Jon C Schommer, Ronald S Hadsall, John A Nyman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic medications account for more prescription expenditures in Medicaid than any other therapeutic category. This has made them an attractive target for states hoping to curtail rising expenditures.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to document the effects of a step-therapy prior authorization (PA) policy for atypical antipsychotic medications on: (1) Medicaid prescription expenditures among all Medicaid beneficiaries and (2) prescription and health service expenditures among patients with schizophrenia.
METHODS: Prescription, inpatient, outpatient, and long-term care State Medicaid Research Files from Georgia and Mississippi from January 1, 1996, to December 31, 1997, were used to model an interrupted time-series analysis. We compared a step-therapy PA policy implemented in Georgia to a nonequivalent/no-treatment control group (Mississippi) over 10-month prepolicy, 11-month policy, and 3-month postpolicy periods. Segmented regression was used to estimate antipsychotic prescription expenditures among all eligible Medicaid beneficiaries. We used generalized estimating equations to model prescription and other health service expenditures with difference-indifference regressions among a cohort of patients with schizophrenia.
RESULTS: Compared with Mississippi, Georgia saved approximately USD 7 million in atypical antipsychotic expenditures over the 11-month policy period. Among patients with schizophrenia, the PA policy was associated with a USD 19.62 per member per month (PMPM) decrease in atypical antipsychotic expenditures and a USD 2.20 PMPM increase in typical antipsychotic expenditures (both, P < 0.001). Among the same patients with schizophrenia however, the reduction in atypical antipsychotic expenditures was accompanied by a USD 31.59 PMPM increase in expenditures for outpatient services (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Although PA of atypical antipsychotics was associated with significant prescription savings to the Georgia Medicaid program, among a vulnerable cohort of patients with schizophrenia, an increase in outpatient expenditures was associated with overall savings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18803994     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  6 in total

1.  Medicaid cost control measures aimed at second-generation antipsychotics led to less use of all antipsychotics.

Authors:  William B Vogt; Geoffrey Joyce; Jing Xia; Riad Dirani; George Wan; Dana P Goldman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Public-academic partnerships: a program to improve the quality of antipsychotic prescribing in a community mental health system.

Authors:  Mary F Brunette; Alexander de Nesnera; Karin Swain; Erik G Riera; Doris Lotz; Stephen J Bartels
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  The effects of prior authorization policies on medicaid-enrolled children's use of antipsychotic medications: evidence from two mid-Atlantic states.

Authors:  Bradley D Stein; Emily Leckman-Westin; Edward Okeke; Deborah M Scharf; Mark Sorbero; Qingxian Chen; Ka Ho Brian Chor; Molly Finnerty; Jennifer P Wisdom
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.576

4.  Patterns of Antipsychotic Prescribing by Physicians to Young Children.

Authors:  Haiden A Huskamp; Marcela Horvitz-Lennon; Ernst R Berndt; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Julie M Donohue
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 5.  Pharmaceutical policies: effects of restrictions on reimbursement.

Authors:  Carolyn J Green; Malcolm Maclure; Patricia M Fortin; Craig R Ramsay; Morten Aaserud; Stan Bardal
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-08-04

6.  Tying comparative effectiveness information to decision-making and the future of comparative effectiveness research designs: the case for antipsychotic drugs.

Authors:  Anirban Basu; Herbert Y Meltzer
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.744

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.