Literature DB >> 18803513

Retroperitoneal endoscopic versus conventional open adrenalectomy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Jennifer M J Schreinemakers1, Sjoerd G Elias, Inne H M Borel Rinkes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out, comparing retroperitoneal endoscopic and conventional adrenalectomy, which is based on a large group of patients, restricted in tumor size for the purpose of ensuring comparability.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1990 and 2004, 61 patients underwent either an endoscopic or open adrenalectomy for tumors smaller than 6 cm. A short-term, base cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to evaluate costs per day prevented, and a sensitivity analysis was calculated.
RESULTS: Average recovery time, postoperative stay, and resumption to oral intake were significantly shorter in the endoscopic group, whereas operative time was longer. No major complications occurred in either group. In 3 endoscopic procedures conversion was indicated. The base cost-effectiveness ratio was 15.41 per day postoperative stay prevented by the endoscopic approach. The number needed to treat with endoscopic adrenalectomy to prevent 1 week of postoperative stay is 2.
CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneal endoscopic adrenalectomy may be considered a cost-effective procedure, compared to the conventional open adrenalectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18803513     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2008.0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  5 in total

1.  Trends in adrenal surgery: institutional review of 528 consecutive adrenalectomies.

Authors:  Anja Lachenmayer; Kenko Cupisti; Achim Wolf; Andreas Raffel; Matthias Schott; Holger S Willenberg; Claus F Eisenberger; Wolfram T Knoefel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic adrenalectomy? A single-centre UK experience.

Authors:  Vasilis A Constantinides; Ioannis Christakis; Philip Touska; Karim Meeran; Fausto Palazzo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The Optimal Approach for Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy through Mono Port regarding Left or Right Sides: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Wooseok Byon; Keehoon Hyun; Ji-Sup Yun; Yong Lai Park; Chan Heun Park
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.257

4.  Risk factors for complications after adrenalectomy: results from a comprehensive national database.

Authors:  Lo Hallin Thompson; Erik Nordenström; Martin Almquist; Helene Jacobsson; Anders Bergenfelz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy versus multi-port laparoendoscopic adrenalectomy: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeng-Cheng Wu; Po-Chien Wu; Yi-No Kang; Ting-En Tai
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-05-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.